Hi Glenn, I’m wondering how you see the next steps unfolding on Section 219 of the pending FY 2027 Defense bill, currently stalled in Congress. If section 219 passes, the US merges its military with Israel’s, further usurping Congress’s war powers. Do you see this merger as blocking congressional ability to keep the US out of Israel’s wars, and locking the US into “the Greater Israel Project?” This provision also mandates the US to share intelligence with Israel, even though Israel currently spies on the US. As if potentially getting wired into genocidal wars is not enough to make this deeply concerning, how is this merger with a foreign power even constitutional?
I just watched the exchange between Rep Ro Khanna and Scahill as part of Taibbi's new, "Anatomy of a Struggle Session" piece. I know you've been friends/friendly with many of the journalists involved, but as someone who's clearly not a member of the "progressive press", can you comment on whether you thought the interview overstepped or whether this line of questioning was journalistically valid?
I can easily answer that question, but you might not like the answer…
First of all, as Ryan Grimm said, let’s give credit to Rohana for showing up to that debate and answering those tough questions. It was a very helpful conversation and we definitely need more of this. They actually used to have conversations like this on CNN, but they don’t anymore.
We are in a climate where ultra-rich zionists like Miriam Adelson can primary you with infinite money, so double points to Mr. Khanna for his bravery in visiting the West Bank (even if it was a political stunt).
Also, he has paved at the way for a AOC visit, and I’m sure other progressives will follow suit.
Here is the part that that you’re not going to like… The people elected Ro Khanna for the purpose of drafting and voting for legislation that benefits the state of California, not be the savior of America. If he does not deliver meaningful results to his constituents, they will not reelect him.
In order for him to accomplish anything, he must walk a tight rope. This requires TRADING VOTES. (google: “logrolling”)
Unfortunately, this is how Washington works. Ro will never get any legislation passed if he does not play ball. what that basically means: He’s going to vote in “unfavorable ways” that you will probably perceive as him going against his principles (or selling out), but this is the tight rope I was talking about.
The other option is that can be a “Doctor no” like Ron Paul and block all legislation. However, doing this is usually political suicide.
If you trust him to make these difficult decisions (trades), you will support him. If you do not trust him, then you will not support him.
this is the sad reality of how Washington works. Maybe one day he votes to block aid to Israel, but the next day he will support arms to Ukraine. which is totally stupid, but that’s how it works. Does that making sense? I’m trying to explain this in the most basic way possible.
Thanks for the reply, but actually, I don't think Khanna was necessarily right/wrong in his answer. I think he's hedging, not due to vote trading (he's already a Massie-aligned red-headed step child) but because he has 2028 Presidential aspirations.
I live in Claire Valdez's district, so my rep already supports a full arms embargo and sanctions.
The question is more whether Taibbi has a valid critique of what the press ought not to do- either for credibility or some other reason- or he's just projecting and the thing he's uncomfortable with is his own failure to speak up on such matters (and his own audience demands).
Personally, I thought Scahill’s questioning of Rep Khanna was so refreshing to hear! It’s not everyday you get to hear real hard hitting questions of a representative of government…and Rep Khanna was able to handle it.
Since you’re an American living in Brazil, can you offer your opinion on this year’s World Cup, since it seems quite orchestrated by FIFA to be another Messi Cup? I’m still waiting to see what, if any, punishment there will be for Argentina’s Falkland banner after yesterday’s match. Who am I kidding, I can tell there’s not going to be any punishment because they don’t want to do anything to prevent Messi from getting another Cup.
With all of the reactions regarding Lindsey Graham's passing, why does there exist this gaslighting campaign where you are now not allowed to criticize the policies and positions he stood for? And by doing so, why are people wrongfully accusing others of "celebrating" his death for simply pointing out some of the demented things he advocated for like nuking Gaza?
Hey Glenn, what do you make of “Professor” Jiang’s overarching theory that the world is run by secret societies, who are able to coordinate together above governments and institutions?
Do you think the weird, creepy “code words” in the Epstein emails make this more plausible? Not to mention Peter Thiel’s secret society that was revealed?
Hi Glenn. Could you please talk about the NDAA's Section 219. This is insane-why would the US want to REQUIRE itself to share intelligence and advanced defense technology with Israel!?! You'd think we'd learn from the past in this abusive relationship and break ties, not choose further entanglement.
When Charlie Kirk died you condemned those who celebrated his death, arguing that we should be selective about cheering on the deaths of public figures, even our enemies like Osama Bin Laden. I agree—celebrating death seems corrosive to the soul. And yet, my first reaction to Lindsey Graham’s death was rather joyful; I truly believe our country is better without him in it, and it seems the entire internet felt the same way. How do you reconcile Graham’s death being a net-positive for society (if you do believe that) with your moral principles about not celebrating death? And do you ever have a joyful first reaction to death, as I did, before remembering your principles? Thank you as always for your incredible reporting.
And there are far worse people out there. But it made for an interesting reflective moment for me, whether this was a life I should truly celebrate being over. And after a moment’s thinking, it was clear—as with most people— that it wasn’t.
My question to you as a journalist; The US was a weak democracy, now it’s a full on oligarchic state. That means our Congress is very corrupt and mostly symbolic. How has our country becoming an oligarchy affected your reporting? I also love dogs. It’s made me a better person.
Why do you think there were more wars in Europe preceding the formation of Israel, than there has been since its formation? And why do you think there were less wars in the Middle East preceding Israel, and more wars since its formation? I believe in pattern recognition, it lessens the disappointment when you assumed what was going to happen before it happens. Love your insight and opinions! Thank you for sharing your thoughts. I was using 78 years as my frame of reference, before and after 1948.
My grandfather was a 33 degree mason friends with McCloy, Roosevelt, and in the same Masonic Lodge as Henry Stimson and both members of the then powerful Pilgrim Society. JFK alluded to secret societies masking the true nature of power.
With MI6, the CIA, and Epstein class perverting the ideal of gov by the people isn’t it therefore yon beyond due time to be advocation for a new government rather than advocating for reform of the current morass of corruption?
Glenn, can you make connections, if there are any, in the increase in rhetoric by the US government sounding the alarms about domestic terrorism, labeled now as FLT (Far Left Terrorism), and the anti-terrorist laws that are being passed and implemented around the world? They seem to originate because of criticism of Zionist Israel, and it's and colonialist policies, but our government now seems to be casting a much broader net.
It seems to me that the China/Russia/Iran/Global South "alliance" is a real "coalition of the willing," based on defense against the U.S. and the mutual goal of "shared prosperity," and that the U.S. has absolutely no "willing" partners. The Israel connection is one of mutual hegemonic agenda, and all other U.S. "allies" are such due to threat of sanction. If true, where might this lead? Your thoughts.
Hi, Glenn. What do you think are the motives behind Trump's recent move to levy a 25% tariff on many imports from Brazil under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974? Do you think it has to do with the Pix payment system in Brazil? Also, what effect will this have on the upcoming Brazilian Presidential election? Finally, could you please provide a brief update on the System Update pups, particularly Toby?
Hi Glenn, I’m wondering how you see the next steps unfolding on Section 219 of the pending FY 2027 Defense bill, currently stalled in Congress. If section 219 passes, the US merges its military with Israel’s, further usurping Congress’s war powers. Do you see this merger as blocking congressional ability to keep the US out of Israel’s wars, and locking the US into “the Greater Israel Project?” This provision also mandates the US to share intelligence with Israel, even though Israel currently spies on the US. As if potentially getting wired into genocidal wars is not enough to make this deeply concerning, how is this merger with a foreign power even constitutional?
Good questions, thanks.
I just watched the exchange between Rep Ro Khanna and Scahill as part of Taibbi's new, "Anatomy of a Struggle Session" piece. I know you've been friends/friendly with many of the journalists involved, but as someone who's clearly not a member of the "progressive press", can you comment on whether you thought the interview overstepped or whether this line of questioning was journalistically valid?
I can easily answer that question, but you might not like the answer…
First of all, as Ryan Grimm said, let’s give credit to Rohana for showing up to that debate and answering those tough questions. It was a very helpful conversation and we definitely need more of this. They actually used to have conversations like this on CNN, but they don’t anymore.
We are in a climate where ultra-rich zionists like Miriam Adelson can primary you with infinite money, so double points to Mr. Khanna for his bravery in visiting the West Bank (even if it was a political stunt).
Also, he has paved at the way for a AOC visit, and I’m sure other progressives will follow suit.
He’s a member of over 50 committees, and a ranking member of the https://armedservices.house.gov/.
Here is the part that that you’re not going to like… The people elected Ro Khanna for the purpose of drafting and voting for legislation that benefits the state of California, not be the savior of America. If he does not deliver meaningful results to his constituents, they will not reelect him.
In order for him to accomplish anything, he must walk a tight rope. This requires TRADING VOTES. (google: “logrolling”)
Unfortunately, this is how Washington works. Ro will never get any legislation passed if he does not play ball. what that basically means: He’s going to vote in “unfavorable ways” that you will probably perceive as him going against his principles (or selling out), but this is the tight rope I was talking about.
The other option is that can be a “Doctor no” like Ron Paul and block all legislation. However, doing this is usually political suicide.
If you trust him to make these difficult decisions (trades), you will support him. If you do not trust him, then you will not support him.
this is the sad reality of how Washington works. Maybe one day he votes to block aid to Israel, but the next day he will support arms to Ukraine. which is totally stupid, but that’s how it works. Does that making sense? I’m trying to explain this in the most basic way possible.
Thanks for the reply, but actually, I don't think Khanna was necessarily right/wrong in his answer. I think he's hedging, not due to vote trading (he's already a Massie-aligned red-headed step child) but because he has 2028 Presidential aspirations.
I live in Claire Valdez's district, so my rep already supports a full arms embargo and sanctions.
The question is more whether Taibbi has a valid critique of what the press ought not to do- either for credibility or some other reason- or he's just projecting and the thing he's uncomfortable with is his own failure to speak up on such matters (and his own audience demands).
Glenn has very quiet about Taibbi's obvious pro-Zionist friendly turn.
Personally, I thought Scahill’s questioning of Rep Khanna was so refreshing to hear! It’s not everyday you get to hear real hard hitting questions of a representative of government…and Rep Khanna was able to handle it.
Since you’re an American living in Brazil, can you offer your opinion on this year’s World Cup, since it seems quite orchestrated by FIFA to be another Messi Cup? I’m still waiting to see what, if any, punishment there will be for Argentina’s Falkland banner after yesterday’s match. Who am I kidding, I can tell there’s not going to be any punishment because they don’t want to do anything to prevent Messi from getting another Cup.
Hello Glenn,
With all of the reactions regarding Lindsey Graham's passing, why does there exist this gaslighting campaign where you are now not allowed to criticize the policies and positions he stood for? And by doing so, why are people wrongfully accusing others of "celebrating" his death for simply pointing out some of the demented things he advocated for like nuking Gaza?
Hey Glenn, what do you make of “Professor” Jiang’s overarching theory that the world is run by secret societies, who are able to coordinate together above governments and institutions?
Do you think the weird, creepy “code words” in the Epstein emails make this more plausible? Not to mention Peter Thiel’s secret society that was revealed?
do u actually think it’s not?!
Hi Glenn. Could you please talk about the NDAA's Section 219. This is insane-why would the US want to REQUIRE itself to share intelligence and advanced defense technology with Israel!?! You'd think we'd learn from the past in this abusive relationship and break ties, not choose further entanglement.
call your congresspeople & demand they vote against an NDAA that includes merging military or intelligence with a foreign country!
Hi Glenn,
When Charlie Kirk died you condemned those who celebrated his death, arguing that we should be selective about cheering on the deaths of public figures, even our enemies like Osama Bin Laden. I agree—celebrating death seems corrosive to the soul. And yet, my first reaction to Lindsey Graham’s death was rather joyful; I truly believe our country is better without him in it, and it seems the entire internet felt the same way. How do you reconcile Graham’s death being a net-positive for society (if you do believe that) with your moral principles about not celebrating death? And do you ever have a joyful first reaction to death, as I did, before remembering your principles? Thank you as always for your incredible reporting.
Well at least you remembered your principles. That’s great, however; with our system the way it is, there will always be another Lindsey Graham.
And there are far worse people out there. But it made for an interesting reflective moment for me, whether this was a life I should truly celebrate being over. And after a moment’s thinking, it was clear—as with most people— that it wasn’t.
My question to you as a journalist; The US was a weak democracy, now it’s a full on oligarchic state. That means our Congress is very corrupt and mostly symbolic. How has our country becoming an oligarchy affected your reporting? I also love dogs. It’s made me a better person.
Why do you think there were more wars in Europe preceding the formation of Israel, than there has been since its formation? And why do you think there were less wars in the Middle East preceding Israel, and more wars since its formation? I believe in pattern recognition, it lessens the disappointment when you assumed what was going to happen before it happens. Love your insight and opinions! Thank you for sharing your thoughts. I was using 78 years as my frame of reference, before and after 1948.
My grandfather was a 33 degree mason friends with McCloy, Roosevelt, and in the same Masonic Lodge as Henry Stimson and both members of the then powerful Pilgrim Society. JFK alluded to secret societies masking the true nature of power.
With MI6, the CIA, and Epstein class perverting the ideal of gov by the people isn’t it therefore yon beyond due time to be advocation for a new government rather than advocating for reform of the current morass of corruption?
Can you please put the Q and A live streams on Rumble? YouTube is CensorTube; Substack chat is not user-friendly.
Glenn, can you make connections, if there are any, in the increase in rhetoric by the US government sounding the alarms about domestic terrorism, labeled now as FLT (Far Left Terrorism), and the anti-terrorist laws that are being passed and implemented around the world? They seem to originate because of criticism of Zionist Israel, and it's and colonialist policies, but our government now seems to be casting a much broader net.
It seems to me that the China/Russia/Iran/Global South "alliance" is a real "coalition of the willing," based on defense against the U.S. and the mutual goal of "shared prosperity," and that the U.S. has absolutely no "willing" partners. The Israel connection is one of mutual hegemonic agenda, and all other U.S. "allies" are such due to threat of sanction. If true, where might this lead? Your thoughts.
Hi, Glenn. What do you think are the motives behind Trump's recent move to levy a 25% tariff on many imports from Brazil under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974? Do you think it has to do with the Pix payment system in Brazil? Also, what effect will this have on the upcoming Brazilian Presidential election? Finally, could you please provide a brief update on the System Update pups, particularly Toby?
I would like to know when Israel is going to return the weapons grade uranium they stole from Pennsylvania?
I LOVE EVERYTHING ABOUT YOU, GLENN! 💚 (no homo). Greatest journalist alive!