Discussion about this post

User's avatar
sclopton's avatar

Glenn, you frequently and forcefully critique the institutional credibility of outlets like the NYT, Washington Post, and WSJ — arguing they serve elite interests, suppress inconvenient stories, and function as propaganda arms of the national security state. Yet in your own reporting and commentary, you regularly cite those same outlets as sources. How do you square that? If their editorial judgment is fundamentally corrupt, why should a citation to their reporting carry any evidentiary weight? And isn’t there a risk that selectively citing them when convenient while dismissing them when inconvenient is itself a form of the epistemic cherry-picking you criticize in others?

RMC's avatar

Glenn, just wondering what you think of Tucker saying about his podcast that it "is the most pro-dog show that exists"? Seems a bold claim, especially when he knows you.

47 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?