909 Comments

Cut the crap. There is no such a thing as a Palestinian. They’re all Arabs. Terrorists, murderers, thieves and crooks. Fatah and Hamas get hundreds of millions in funding from the Arab oil cartel, The EU, and the US. Lines the pickets of the thieving so called leadership. Arab murder of Jews goes way back before there ever was an Israel. Their favorite slogan “ichbad al yahood “ ( slaughter the Jews) has been chanted since forever. Haj Amin al Husseiny the Mufty of Jerusalem went to Hitler to make a deal when Hitler conquers Egypt and British mandated Palestine he should ship all the Jews to the death camps. Before you go ape shit on the Jews living and defending themselves in the ancient land of Israel with Jerusalem as its capital for over 3000 yrs. it would behoove you Glen to learn some history (ancient annd modern) so that you could put you love of the Arabs and hatred of the Jews living the modern land of Israel intoroper context. Let me start you off; The land of Israel for the people of Israel.

Expand full comment
author

A few points:

1) The pro-Israel position is the overwhelming, dominant position of the establishment wings of both political parties and the mainstream media. I know a lot of people on the right like to think that the media and Dems are anti-Israel but it's 100% false. Every president after Jimmy Carter has been steadfastly pro-Israel. The president who most challenged that was George HW Bush, with James Baker. Even Bush 43 was more even-handed than Clinton, Obama and Biden (the sole exception was Obama's abstention on the UN Resolution as punishment for Bibi's openly campaigning against him, and most of his aides were vehemently opposed to this). Few political figures in the US are more pro-Israel than Biden and Hillary. AIPAC loves Dems and the GOP equally. There is no daylight between them (the only ones questioning the orthodoxy are the Squad on the left and the Ron/Rand Paul faction on the right).

2) The media is no different. At CNN, several commentators have been fired for being anti-Israel (Marc Lamont Hill, Rick Sanchez, Octavia Nasr) while none has been for being too pro-Israel. So this view is overwhelmingly the dominant and almost all US discourse. And every security state agency -- the NSA/CIA/DoD -- is even more pro-Israel than they.

3) I'm well-aware that a sizable chunk of my readership here -- perhaps the majority -- disagrees with my views on Israel and Palestine (though my views are consistent with my broader anti-militarism/anti-imperialism stand). It'd be easier for me to just not write about this. But I hope I have a readership that does not want me merely to echo what they already think, but which trusts I'm going to always be honest about what I see and think and not try to aggrandize anyone. I'm more than willing to engage critics -- as I said, I'm talking to a couple right-wing MAGA Israel supporters to have on to explore these questions -- but to me, the value of this independent platform is not that I am a puppet for anyone side or faction but will also endeavor to tell you what I think and see, and I've always had a readership that could tolerate that kind of dissent and divergence from their strongly held views because they know I come by mine honestly and with an attempt to be scrupulous with the facts.

I get that it'd be way easier for me to just avoid this topic altogether, just to avoid reader dissension. But I wouldn't feel comfortable with myself if I did.

Expand full comment
May 12, 2021Liked by Glenn Greenwald

You do you, Glenn - that's why we respect you. I don't care if we don't see eye to eye on a number of policy items. I'm center/right, and you're left. I can care less. What matters to me is your decades-long advocacy and work on behalf of OUR civil liberties and your relentless courage. My much more conservative cousin has exactly the same view of you. You're a national treasure.

Expand full comment

And unfortunately a rare treasure today as corrupt corporate media dominate the conversation.

Expand full comment

Great post.

I am a conservative-leaning hater of established parties and I couldn't agree more with why I support Glenn.

Expand full comment

I respect your honesty and work ethic. In addition to real courage.

Expand full comment

*international

Expand full comment

Everyone is entitled to their own opinions but not to their own facts. Present a factual, historic argument rather than mouthing platitudes that have been promulgated by the left and right Israel haters.

Expand full comment
author

This article wasn't intended to litigate the Israel/Gaza dispute. It described it in the briefest terms. The point was about AOC's role and her decision to attack someone with no power rather than the people in her party who are implementing these policies that she claims to find so immoral. I've been clear that I believe the Palestinians are oppressed and mistreated -- that's not a view I've hidden -- but this article really wasn't about that at all. It just described the conflict in the minimal way necessary to make the broader point. But yes, I do not share the establishment right's view (which is also the Democratic Party's view) on Israel/Palestine.

Expand full comment

For people like Roland your article simply became a useful tool for venting his hate toward a whole group of people, yet you spent so much time in responding to that hate, and no doubt knowing it will do nothing to temper his distortions, or his hate.

Expand full comment

I know I shouldn’t be so naive, but I was absolutely blown away by the hatred being slung in every direction in the comments on this article, especially by Roland. I guess this is why most people steer clear of Israel/Palestine debates, or even mentioning it (like this article, which like Glenn said isn’t even litigating that issue but is focused on others).

I’m already a pretty pessimistic dude but seeing how (literally) militant people got here, and how cavalier they are about the use of violence toward their designated enemy is still chilling.

Expand full comment

I agree with everything you said. I never would go on twitter because of all the hate they say is spewed there, and feel tempted to discontinue being here. Greenwald should really not have created a platform for Roland's hate, which is what he did with such a lengthy response, which muddied the waters, but I do understand he was trying to explain the purpose of his article which had nothing to do with what happened today. I'm glad to see I'm not the only one who had such a negative reaction.

'

Expand full comment

He isn’t litigating the Israeli Palestinian differences because he has already ruled on the topic in favor of the Palestinians. But he does go on at length about his ruling. He’s not being honest in saying that the article was merely about AOC. For that to be true, you have to ignore the extensive assumptions he states.

Expand full comment

I think there's at least two types of post on most of Glenn's essays - especially on a topic such as the Isreali Palestinian conflict. The worst, and the ones best ignored (even if I cant help myself sometimes) are the haters and trolls. Then there are those who have very passionate thoughts and emotions on topic. Again, this piece touches on one of those red hot button issues. Obviously, there are others, too, but not with the same heat. I can definitely do without the haters and trolls

Expand full comment

Oh please! You can't be serious.

Expand full comment

😩 SMH. I’ve noticed the conversation often veers from content and subject to debates and fights about all sorts of unrelated things. People arguing and spewing off righteous knowledge, with dates and quotes and other data to back it up, about completely unrelated shit. You wanna know what I think? I think it’s actually a rather common happenstance for people who consider themselves smart. Which your fans are for the most part. Smart people can often be rather righteous. And they usually rather stick to what they know, lest they be found to not be as bright as their shine. So they disregard all whiplash precautions and take any conversation back there, to their territory. From where they can comfortably pump out their pompous lectures and pump up their egos. It’s not necessarily evil, though it can easily be, it’s human really. We like to be right, we like to be/see ourselves as helpful, and as leaders even. I personally find these self righteous journeys in conversation futile, generally speaking. Don’t get me wrong, I’m all for different opinions and different sharings of knowledge and experience, etc. But to build, not to dismantle. To unite, not to divide.

Is it so hard to stick to the subject at hand as best as possible People?!!

It must be frustrating for you as a journalist. Again I ask: which came first? The bullshit propagandists on “the news”, or the demand for them? But I applaud and appreciate you for sticking to the truth and the actual news. And not just telling some your readers what they might want to hear, but instead telling us all wtf actually happened. Obrigado!♥️

Expand full comment

It is hard to stay on topic. I will try better.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Bizarre, and scary. But I’ve learned to ask why, instead. Propaganda? Religious hatred? His ex??!!!! There’s usually a reason someone would say and do something so stupid. And it’s not always, or even typically, because they just flat out want to be an ass. When we cancel them, we learn nothing of what they knew. What bothered them. Of what maybe made them think that way, and how we can learn from and/or change that. Or if maybe we are the ones who needed to change.

Ignoring is good for our immediate self preservation. Long term ignorance is how we got to here.

Expand full comment

Why do you bother to invoke AOC and Andrew Yang? Yang is a none/ entity as far as NYC voters are concerned. The best candidate for the mayoralty is Eric Adams . The Black borough president of Brooklyn. Out front by 9-10% of any other candidate. As far as your disappointment with AOC the the Democratic Socialist learned fast how to get ahead in politics. That’s what it’s all about. Getting power once people have swallowed your bs and put you in office. Advertise yourself constantly on social media, never getting anything done and moving up the ladder. How do you know when a politician is lying? When her lips are moving. Don’t be disappointed. It’s only politics. Democrat or Republican Two sides of the same coin.

Expand full comment

AOC wanted to make a statement without attacking her octogenarian seniors. So she went after Andrew Yang whom she probably does not greatly respect and considers an opportunist.

Expand full comment

And in doing so, AOC shows that she is also an opportunist.

Expand full comment

RolandMay 12

Why do you bother to invoke AOC and Andrew Yang? .... to showcase how corrupt our government officials are. All of them!

Expand full comment

Yes. This thread got derailed. That is the problem with issues like the Middle East conflicts. You raise one issue and people immediately dive into other issues. It is hard to keep us on track.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

I am just as guilty as other thread derailers. I am going to keep my future comments to the issue raised in the article.

Expand full comment

"This article wasn't intended to litigate the Israel/Gaza dispute."

Just wait until you write THAT article. Your entire audience will explode.

Expand full comment

I think you're right, and although you weren't looking for my opinion, in the past I have never been on such, well lets call it, a conservative site, and a difference of opinion even on the topic of Israel would engender such animosity. The audience, or too many seemed not to understand the point of the article which had nothing to do with Israeli policy by and large, but AOC's, well, wanting to move up the ladder in the political world, which means you adopt the accepted narrative on Israel. She's willing like the rest to sell her soul, which doesn't surprise me since I never thought she was that authentic even before she was a tunnel away from the Capital building during the riot and claimed she was at death's door.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

I say if we want National security we START at stopping funding Israel. Bring troops home and give them jobs rebuilding our infrastructure.

Do I think we’re going to? No. Not till it is entirely too late.

Expand full comment

You make two separate proposals. One I agree with.

I'd agree on bringing the troops home. Staring with Afghanistan and Syria. Then extend to S Korea, Japan, France, England and Germany. And Finally the District of Columbia. Use them on US infrastructure, beginning with completion of the wall on our southern border.

As far as stopping funding, there are lots of areas where I would support eliminating funding before cutting off the small amount of $$$ provided to Israel. Let's stop funding the WHO, BLM, PLO and Hamas. And Minneapolis, DC, the Dep of "Education," etc.

Expand full comment

"Everyone is entitled to their own opinions but not to their own facts."

I so tire of hearing this ridiculous sentiment.

The real truth: In most cases of establishing common "facts," opinion rules.

Expand full comment

Timothy in the case of Roland his blatant ignorance was not the main issue for me, but his hate was, and it was disgusting. I'm surprised there is not more outrage on this site at his hate filled rhetoric against the Arabs, against the Palestinians.

Expand full comment

his hate was wrong, and your moral posturing is disingenuous.

Expand full comment

My moral posturing? What about your's?

Expand full comment

Well, I read his post here to be aimed at misplaced hatred of Israel, not necessarily an ignoring of misplaced hatred of non-Jewish semites, but I like how you noticed that I took issue with his first sentence, and you his second.

Even the otherwise like-minded opine about the "facts"!

Expand full comment

Wait you were refering to M. Roland's op, where I agree he came across quite incensed.

Expand full comment

That is because truth requires the person to verify a statement and in todays lazy ass society no one wants to spend time doing that.

Expand full comment

Well, this forum spends time doing that, which is another reason I like it here. (Sorry to those who think I over-post. Still trying to moderate myself, I promise.)

Still, "verifications" are wrought with opinion, too. Even here, "claims" of "fact" vastly outnumber the more accurate "imo"s.

Expand full comment

I agree that phrase is vastly over utilized. “It is what it is” a vacuous load of drivel also way over used.

Expand full comment

Let’s see. If I tell you that you deserve a punch in the eye, that’s an opinion. If punch you in the eye and it becomes black and blue, that’s a fact. Do you now get the difference?

Expand full comment

That "fact" would get suspect in a court of law, where the opinion of the jury (at least "beyond a reasonable doubt", whatever the jury decides THAT is). Were there witnesses? Was it documented? Was it self-defense? Did someone else (possibly, not factually!) do it, not you?

Yes, it can reasonably be considered fact that the sun rose on me this morning. Will it rise for me tomorrow? idk, I'll keep my cell phone camera ready; digital photos are forever, and they time-stamp them now! (Wait, am I connected? Is my date and time accurate? Should I put a "newspaper" (can I even find one?!) in the photo to "factualize" the date?

Sorry, I love to ramble.

Expand full comment

"Will it rise for me tomorrow?" I think that depends on what goes down between the Hogfather, Susan Sto-Helit, and Mr. Teatime.

Expand full comment

The fact is Israel is an effective conquest (meaning legal, accepted by all major powers), but still, it was built on land populated by others.

So some people have a problem with it - based on moral considerations.

Btw that story about Haj Amin al Husseiny (shipping the Jews to death camps) is a perfect fake story.

And no, he wasn't in Auschwitz either; it's another fake story.

Expand full comment

Nearly 717,000 Jews lived in the territory of Palestine in 1948. It is a shame the Muslims could not accept the concept of allowing the Jews to return to their eternal capital when the modern state of Israel was created. Now, the grandchildren of those who tried to murder all the Jews have made themselves the darlings of the world of victimization.

Expand full comment

Accept settlers from another continent to take your land?

If half a million people from another land suddenly disembarked on your shore, brought in thousands of tons of smuggled arms, and then proceeded to terrorize your communities which lived there for many generations in order to abandon their villages and best land, raze to ground many of them including the cemeteries where your ancestors are buried, rename every toponym in the land to erase the historic memory - would you accept that? Israel is from the very inception a settler project, very similar to South Africa - ethnic cleansing is in its nature, which is perfectly visible in the episode that sparked this latest round - simply unable to tolerate that Palestinians still own this or that patch of land or property that is coveted by Israelis - so simply take it away from them.

Expand full comment

You make an excellent point, jbt1980. It is time that we, as responsible citizens of the world, all return to our ancestors' place of origin. It is criminal that Denali was renamed and that the native Americans were displaced. All white people must return to Europe immediately! Personally, I would prefer living in Switzerland to the USA. I just never thought I could afford it until reading your insightful and logical statement.

Expand full comment

Why start in the middle of the movie? They call it the Promised Land because God gave it to the Jews back in the beginning, they called it The Land of Canaan back then - more than 2,000 years before Christ.

Expand full comment

So it was no different than in the US, Russia, China. All (today legal) conquests of other people's lands.

Russia to this day is a huge colonial empire.

The only difference is Israel was a late, 20th-century (legal) conquest.

In the 20th century, people generally believed that colonialism, imperialism, conquests were bad things.

Not so much earlier.

Expand full comment

94,000 in 1914.

Expand full comment

Probably even less in 1814. :-D

Expand full comment

Great and so did Christians-- so what?

Expand full comment

Correct. Jews born in Israel pre-1948 have Palestine as place of birth on their birth certificates.

Expand full comment

Here’s a tidbit about American anti-Semitism - when my parents immigrated from Europe shortly before the war, the state department filled in the box calling for nationality “ Jewish”. Not Russian. Not Polish. Jewish.

Expand full comment

You may be right about Auschwitz but there is recent photographic evidence placing the Grand Mufti at another concentration camp.

https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/amin-al-husseini-nazi-concentration-camp

His time spent in Nazi Germany, meeting Hitler and others, is well documented as are his antisemitic speeches and other Nazi propaganda broadcast in the Middle East.

What can be argued is the extent of his persuasive powers on his fellow Arabs. But that is something of a parlor game at this point.

Expand full comment

Why would it be surprising if the Mufti were anti Semitic, given what he lived and saw of the Zionist project in Palestine?

Expand full comment

You’re saying antisemitism and Nazi collab is justified because of Zionism

Expand full comment

There was nothing wrong with seeking allies.

Till 1941 Nazi Germany was still a better country than the genocidal Soviet Union with its millions of victims.

Others did it too, some Jewish groups tried to ally with Fascist Italy or Germany (against Britain) as late as 1941.

The Jews and Nazi Germany cooperated in colonizing Palestine (till 1939 - so-called Haavara Agreement).

And there was the long cooperation between the Jews and Fascist Italy in Civitavecchia (the Betar Naval Academy.)

It wasn't like the Mufti sought allies...

Expand full comment

That was a work camp attached to a SS artillery training school (?).

I suppose he visited the school not the (boring and quite small) camp.

Expand full comment

what was boring and quite small? The concentration camp? 2 stars on yelp? You're joking right

Expand full comment

It's absolutely a true story.

Expand full comment

Check out this link of your brothers you worm. Does it remind you of something? "Night of knives" maybe?

https://m.jpost.com/israel-news/right-wing-rioters-smash-windows-of-arab-owned-businesses-in-bat-yam-667993/amp

Expand full comment

It’s funny you say that Israel is a conquest country. When I was in Jerusalem about 10 years ago, I saw some excavation going on in the Arab quarter and that lo and behold, they found remnants of Jewish construction…under the Arab quarter……

Expand full comment

"...Israel is a conquest country..."

Of course it is. That same parcel of earth has been conquered by various peoples over and over and over for millennia.

"...they found remnants of Jewish construction…under the Arab quarter..."

Of course they did. And in much of the region, you will find further layers under the Jewish construction. Like the fortress Carroc which has at points been occupied, rebuilt, and added onto by Muslims, Christians, Israelites, Edomites, Moabites... and who knows what, all of whose blood has wet those stones.

So who has claim? All have claim. If peace is to be had, at some point it needs to be sorted out. People need to want peace badly enough to make it happen.

Expand full comment

According to international law new territory could be acquired by conquest or by agreement.

In the case of the former, it's nice to have international recognition of the conquest.

In any case, possession is nine-tenths of the rights.

There is literally nothing more to it.

All that talk about the historical rights, soil, glory, grandfathers and ancient banners means nothing.

Expand full comment

No. According to international law acquisition by conquest is always illegal.

"...

Given the stillbirth of the U.N. collective security system, nonrecognition is one of the few realistic ways the international community has sanctioning deterring conquerors. This much is taken as axiomatic in international law. Indeed, the anti-conquest norm and its nonrecognition corollary are so important that in the view of most international lawyers, even conquest through lawful self-defense against an aggressor is forbidden.

..."

https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1179&context=facultyworkingpapers

Expand full comment

"Land populated on others.... "

The people in the land did not even own it. The felahs, the felahdin, were effectively serfs, working for absentee Arab landlords. The felahs themselves were a mix of conquered or displaced peoples who had frequently been forced to convert generations before. The distant landlords were the ones who made deals to give land to the Jews. The Palestinians who had worked the land for generations were never consulted by either side. They were just told to leave. That, naturally, left them a bit miffed and lead to violence. Jewish settlers frequently further provoked the Palestinians in order to generate a British crackdown.

So, the situation was never one-sided. It was multilateral with many to blame.

Expand full comment

How would you feel if the military came to your house and business and told you that you had to vacate for another group? Then they put your family in a terrible area, restricted your movement, made it virtually impossible for your kids to get an educated, etc? Sounds much like the brutal pogroms perpetrated on Jewish people for milennia.

Expand full comment

Sounds like the best argument I've ever heard for a big defense budget.

Expand full comment

How would it be if your landlord told you that you were being evicted at the end of your current lease? Sometimes, life sucks. But just because someone is doing something wrong or bad does not make it unethical or illegal.

Expand full comment

Right and no one else has EVER experienced that? right?

Expand full comment

Happened to the Jews in the Gaza strip and in Jerusalem as well.

Expand full comment

Doesn’t sound remotely like anything Israel has actually done or is contemplating doing. Remember the Arab Israeli reaction to Avigdor Lieberman’s musings about redrawing the border in any peace settlement to place what is known as “The Triangle” on the Palestine side? They rejected the idea outright, even though they would otherwise stay in place. Perhaps they know something about living in Israel that outsiders are missing.

Expand full comment

The article was on AOC's role in DNC...

As for few facts:

Palestinian children killed by Israel: The human dimension – April 26, 2021

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1YmQC9uSlM

Biden Admin Neutral On Child Murder + Max Blumenthal outstanding overview

https://youtu.be/7dbLAiEdQv4

Expand full comment

Preferably with links for citations in your arguments as well.

Expand full comment

Glenn, it is important to listen to all sides including the evidence they present to support their position. It is a matter of both common courtesy and intellectual honesty. Unfortunately, for many, the Israeli-Arab conflict turns out to be a blank canvas onto which we can project our disappointments, frustrations and anger onto an historically safe target of opprobrium - once upon a time, it was simply the Jews while now it is their nation state. Much of the criticism seems a product of double-standards when it is not simply ill-informed.

One of the underlying yet unexplored issues, it seems to me, is a certain societal unease with their re-emergence of the Jew seeking equal treatment. The Diaspora Jew, by contrast, a minority wherever he went and, only since the late 18th century, allowed by fits and starts to emerge from his second (at best) class citizenship, appears to some the only acceptable Jew. Whether it derives from theological concerns or crackpot “scientific” principles, the Jew represented by the self-sufficient Israeli gnaws at something very elemental in both Western and Islamic societies - and for good reason, given their supercessionist views of having replaced Judaism and the Jews, yet they are still around not only falsifying this bit of dogma but, as the saying goes “punching above their weight”.

What else explains this continuing and frankly bizarre focus on Israel whose net result is that far greater tragedies and losses of life that occur elsewhere can be ignored - and to pose this question is not an exercise in “whataboutery” but to ask that some common standard and context be used in the discussion.

To your credit, you are one of the few who do examine other conflicts and highlight other injustices. When it comes to Israel, though, I can hope you have the bandwidth in between everything else you do, to re-examine some of your assumptions and be a bit more critical of some of your sources of information. You might still see things the same way, but something tells me that you will emerge with a more nuanced view.

In the interim, please keep doing what you do. It takes far more courage than to post a comment and is far more consequential.

As a final, unrelated question, when will you be offering signed copies of your book to your members (or did i miss the memo)?

Expand full comment
author

I'll probably do a video to address these comments tomorrow -- the substantive ones on I/P - since I don't have a lot of time today. I'm working with my publisher on getting the way to get signed books to subscribers. The difficulty is the pandemic but I believe that I'll be in the US now in August so it may have to wait until then. But I absolutely will fulfill that commitment.

Expand full comment

There is no rush to respond, especially given your other commitments. I’m pretty sure that the Israeli-Arab issue will be with us for quite some time yet.

Expand full comment

Sadly true. Trump was making progress

Expand full comment

And it was REAL progress, the kind that can't be executive ordered away, like lower illegal immigration that's so easy to reverse by flying deportees back in to vote Dem, I mean lower wages, I mean fill cages, I mean penalize legal immigrants, I mean move around to avoid the media. Oh, wait....the media does that itself.

Expand full comment

That more of my taxpayer dollars go to Israel than any other nation -- and that our foreign policy is shaped around Israel -- makes that nation's actions highly relevant, rising above others. I pay for what it does and I don't like what it does.

Surely you'd care more about the cleanliness of the restaurant you eat at than one you don't? Care more about how well your city bus functions than others, when on the way to work? Whether the washing machine you bought with your hard earned money works -- or engages in collective punishment contrary to international law.

Expand full comment

Your premise about money going to Israel (which must use the bulk of it on US corporations) is wrong. The US spends far more in Europe, Japan and Korea.

And while you may wish to believe that our foreign policy is shaped around Israel, a minute’s reflection would show that, if anything, it’s shaped around oil and the free passage thereof. Which means it’s shaped mostly around Arab and world economic concerns. The conflicts in the region we have fought have either been on behalf of an Arab country (Kuwait or Lebanon in 1958) or for our own misguided reasons (Iraq in 2002 and Syria a few years later).

That people try to rationalize their obsession with Jews by grabbing at any excuse is certainly troubling, but it’s best to see the world as it is rather than the imagined one we’d prefer.

Expand full comment

So please post evidence of annual direct payments to any other single government above $3.8 billion or apologize for implying some kind of racism on my part.

Expand full comment

Here you go: https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theatlantic.com/amp/article/585988/

I wasn’t applying any racism on your part, just an unhealthy obsession. Because Jews come in all “colors”, they may be many things but a race is not among them. And before you get defensive about any implication, I’m assuming you were using the term racism somewhat casually with no malicious underlying intent.

Expand full comment

The US military spends over $8 billion annually in Germany alone.

https://www.iamexpat.de/expat-info/german-expat-news/germany-spent-almost-billion-euros-us-troops-past-10-years

And unlike NATO, Korea and Japan, the US has no treaty obligation to defend Israel against attack.

Expand full comment

Can it possibly be that Israel, being the only western democracy in the Middle East, has strategic value double than that of Jordan and Egypt?

They each get around half of what Israel gets.

Expand full comment

Why do you choose to be so unaware of what is being said here when it is so obviously true. I can only assume you are totally unaware of the influence Israel has on our national policies, and our wars. Why are our politicians so beholden to Israel? Why is their so much complicity in both parties to remain silent on Israel's many crimes committed against the people of Palestine? Why do our politicians go before APAC and swear their allegiance to Israel? Yes, and why all the money sent there? Pick up a book by Max Blumenthal, or would you define him as a self hating jew? There are so many who are willing to speak the truth, as there are Americans who stand up to injustice and brutality and war.

Expand full comment

Yeah it's the elders of Zion right! The reason America is beholden to Israel is because Israel and their supporters organize extensively for America's support, as it is a world power. The reason Israel organizes for America's support is because people like you and millions and maybe billions of others somehow can't held slipping back into antisemitic tropes when Jews are involved, which somehow or another has always lead to Jews being killed, so Israel is not taking chances in a region where it's surrounding neighbors routinely attempt to attack and annihilate them. But if you really cared about brutality, you'd find no shortage of what to speak of when it comes to the middle east. You don't. Why? Why don't you speak of it? Why only Israel? Can you speak with complexity about any other country in the region? You fell for it boo

Expand full comment

Its not an obsession with Jews its with Israel.

Expand full comment

You mean the Israeli Arabs, the Druze, Circassian and Christians or, to put it differently, all the Israelis BDS oddly doesn’t target? Or is it just Israeli Jews?

Given your flurry of hit and run postings, I won’t expect anything thoughtful but I would be glad to be proven wrong.

Expand full comment

Mr Knapp, I realize you have this thing about the Jews, but in reality aid to Israel has zero to do with Jews or Zionism or even AIPAC. It is all about dollars and profits of the US military complex. I am quite sure the Pentagon does not like the optics of what is happening and will let the Israelis know. BTW, the spending in Europe is not the same category of spending and is mostly paid by Europeans, even though, of course, they never pay enough. American protection is not free. Just an aside.

Expand full comment

Looks like you’re mistaken. For instance, the US military spends over $8 billion annually on Germany alone, beyond what Germany reimbursed.

https://www.iamexpat.de/expat-info/german-expat-news/germany-spent-almost-billion-euros-us-troops-past-10-years

Expand full comment

Money laundering with a skim off the top?

Expand full comment

But would you hate Israel any less, were we to zero that aid? (I am for zeroing that aid; I don't think Israel needs it.)

Expand full comment

Ok. Israel support can come from that portion of the debt that nobody will ever pay then. There. Fixed it.

Expand full comment

Good one! (But by that logic, why do we borrow so little? Like, why don't we make the "minimum" wage $100 an hour?!)

Expand full comment

Great comments

Expand full comment

So well said! And bizarre is right: one would think Western freedoms of religion and association and movement, not to mention self-sufficiency (I love the way Jews don't petition for public assistance), would inform Westerners properly, but since 1948 anyway the Western anti-semites seem to feel free to say to the Jew, "Why don't you get back to where you belong, the scrubby land we (WE!) so magnanimously gave to you."

Was it justice, centuries delayed, to "create" a homeland, or just another excuse to keep on hating.

Well, here's a reason for some to hate on me: I have come to the opinion that Israel should NOT have been created, but instead the hero nation of the mid-'40s should have turned on the freedom beacon and said, "To us! To us! We are your new land of freedom."

Expand full comment

No I appreciate the piece and have to question how much my own beliefs have been shaped by my culture. In reading Middle Eastern history I came to the conclusion that some groups were shafted but it is to late to fix it. Israel is not going away nor should it. I think the “Palestinians” have been led incredibly poorly, almost as if they don’t want the problems solved.

Expand full comment

You've raised a crucial point that few focus on. Palestinians have terrible leaders (terrorists) who are willing to sacrifice their own people for international sympathy. They will put civilians in or near key sites to be sacrificed. They refuse to come to the beginning table to acknowledge the basic starting point: that Israel exists. Even the rest of the Arab States have grown weary of this. It is true that Palestine's leaders don't seem to want to solve this problem. It should be clear why the US gives such huge support to Israel, an allie on such a strategic place. Israel is a tiny place surrounded by countries that hate it and want it destroyed. True, Israel doesn't handle the impossible problem of how to fairly treat Palestinians, on the other hand, Israel has to be tough because they are surrounded by wolves who, with the first sign of weakness, will devout them. I have been to Israel and spent the past three years living In Egypt. It was an eye-opening experience.

Expand full comment

So incompetent people should just die? Imagine if that was applied to the US

Expand full comment

I don't know who is advocating for that

Expand full comment

This is such a broad, sweeping statement I wouldn't know how to respond except to say it is sad when anyone dies, and there are varying degrees of sadness and circumstances, and sometimes things turn out one way or another based on incompetence or luck or any number of variables. But that's a whole other topic.

Expand full comment

IMO the "palestinians" have been used as a proxy weapon by other countries who are afraid to be direct with Israel. So you see everyone crying for the Palestinians but their Muslim allies spend money empowering Hamas rather than building up the Palestinians.

Do yourself a favor and research every single point or post in this thread because every single "side" is pushing an agenda.

To me though, it sure seems like only one side is pushing a pro-Democracy agenda.

Expand full comment

"Gasp" seriously-- and of course Palestinians don't want problems solved bu just want to die right?

Expand full comment

Like many tangled situations, the problem is that there are more than two parties involved, each bringing their own interests. The Palestinian +leaders+ don't want to solve the problems because they often benefit greatly from the conflict. The leaders often do not negotiate in good faith and blame it on the Jews. Some of the Palstinians are passive bystanders, some are whipped up by the claims of the leaders, some are acting personally because +their+ family was killed or +their+ house was burned. The Palestinian +people+ then bear the brunt of Israeli retaliation. In the same manner, Israeli settlers have often acted unilaterally, knowing that stoking the conflict benefits them. The rest of the Israeli population may or may not agree with the settler's actions, but they learn to hate Palestinians when rockets rain down on their homes and kill +their+ families.

It is just not a neat and tidy problem.

Expand full comment

Ugh typos. Meant to say they refuse to come to the "negotiating" table.

Expand full comment

Personally, I appreciated the typo that changed “devour” to “devout” as conversion to Islam is historically the only way to shed dhimmi status in a Muslim majority society ... well, that or death.

Expand full comment

Actually, it isn't even called "conversion" it is called "reversion." When a person becomes a Muslim they "revert," as Islam is the only way. And I was told explicitly by every Egyptian Muslim I knew when I lived in Luxor that none of them can ever stop being a Muslim. If one denies one's faith they must be killed. This seems to be the answer for a lot of things. To be fair, in many ways the Coptic religion is even more restrictive if that is possible. Christians are also taught from the Bible, there is no way to heaven except through Jesus. I grew up in an extremely conservative Christian family. I rebelled and it wasn't easy, but at least I wasn't killed for it. And at least in the US there were options, I could go out on my own, get a job, go to college, because there was freedom to do so--although we seem to be losing it. People in Muslim countries, especially women most often do not have options other than to live under the thumb of an extreme religion, or at least an extreme interpretation of it. Honestly, I would rather live under the rule of any of the Israeli leaders than Hamas.

Expand full comment

Glenn I'm definitely pro-Israel, but not reflexively so. Like all nations they act in their self interest but not always in ways that I agree with. I'm also sympathetic to the plight of ordinary everyday Palestinians, as well as Christians in Bethlehem (the latter having no choice but to produce hand crafts and sell them to Christians around the world). In all likelihood you and I will disagree on many things on this topic, but I appreciate and expect that you will challenge what I believe. So, please, keep it up.

On this general topic one thing I'd like to see addressed is the following: Do the Palestinians really want a settlement? Every time it appears there is a potential opening to get a deal done their leadership seems to scuttle it. While right of return is generally consistent with international law, how could that possibly work with Israel being a Jewish state? And what is Israel to do when missiles are fired indiscriminately into Israeli neighborhoods, as opposed to military targets?

Expand full comment

While I agree with much of what you said, there in fact is no “right of return” in international law. To date, there has been but one exception and, ironically, it is contained in the League of Nations Mandate for Palestine which explicitly gave that right to the Jewish people. The Palestinian “right” is taken from UNGA 194 which made in conditional and was a multi-part non-binding resolution which the Arabs unanimously rejected lest by implication they acknowledged Israel’s legitimacy.

What makes the current situation unique was the new concept of Mandates (they were supposed to be similar to a trusteeship rather than a colony) whose full consequences were apparently never quite thought through. By analogy, today’s Palestinians who left property behind in what’s now Israel would perhaps equate to non-resident enemy aliens of Israel.

Expand full comment

Thanks, Charles. My statement regarding the right of return vis-a-vis international law is based upon general recollection rather than actually researching the issue. I'll take a look at UNGA 194, and the rest of your points. That said, I cannot see how a right of return can possibly be reconciled with Israel existing as a Jewish state. And given world history over the last 2000 year, and especially European history in the 20th AND 21st centuries, I definitely come down on the side of Israel on this.

Expand full comment

Jeff, you speak for many of us. The assumption that only the Right Wing could possibly be pro-Israel is as biased and offensive as the assumption that all black Americans only vote for Democrats. Yes, many liberals support Israel, just as many blacks vote for Republicans.

I appreciate all reporting on the Arab Muslim-Jew split, because for the most part it illuminates the folly of mankind's biases.

Expand full comment

Hold on didn't I just read this point by someone else--- hmmmmm I smell a campaign-- thanks Bibi

Expand full comment

So glad to have you engage substantively, rather than post hit and run snipes.

Expand full comment

There are questions beyond the points, which would best be addressed with substantive answers. IMO.

Expand full comment

Your point has already been made by someone else

Expand full comment

You call it like you see it and continue being honest. “Good people can agree to disagree without being disagreeable.” We are all more knowledgeable after a spirited debate.

Expand full comment

That you would even consider supporting AOC is scary. From the beginning she has always been a hard left socialist radical.

And being an American Jew myself, I’m always amazed by the sympathy that others of your sort provide to left wingers and are highly critical of Israel. I came to the conclusion that people like you worship left wing policy as your primary religion and being Jewish is just your ethnicity.

You say that you only briefly touched on the policy involved and that the article was focused on AOC being supportive of the same old Democratic gang who have supported Israel since 1948. And then you go on and on describing how THEY blindly support Israel, which is NOT true, regardless of what you say.

Harry Truman was an anti-Semite. Here are some excerpts from his personal diary….

In his diary, he wrote an entry on July 21, 1947:

“The Jews, I find are very selfish. They have no concern for Poles, Estonians, Latvians and other Displaced Persons; they are only interested in themselves. When they have power, physical or political, neither Hitler nor Stalin has anything on them for cruelty or mistreatment to the underdog”.

Former Treasury Secretary, Henry Morgenthau, Jr., a Jew, spoke with President Truman about the sad state of affairs of Holocaust survivors, passengers of the ship Exodus, who were turned away from the shores of Palestine by the British and were sent back to Europe. Morgenthau asked the President to intervene with the British to allow the Jews entry into Palestine.

Of this request, Truman wrote in his diary: “He had no business whatever to call me. The Jews have no sense of proportion nor do they have any judgement on world affairs. Henry brought one thousand Jews to New York on a supposedly temporary basis and they stayed.”

He often called New York City “kike town”; he referred to his Jewish partner, Eddie Jacobson, as his “Jew clerk” and he wrote to Bess about someone in a poker game who had “screamed like a Jewish merchant”.

Once, in 1953, the television host, David Susskind, asked the ex-President why he had never been invited to the Truman home in spite of their many interviews.

Truman replied: “You’re a Jew, David, and no Jew has ever been in our house. Bess runs it and there’s never been a Jew inside the house in her or her mother’s lifetime”.

Why did Truman recognize Israel? Because he wanted displaced Jews to have a place other than the US to go to. He didn’t want Jews in the US just like he didn’t want them in his own house.

But you ignore such crap?

Here’s more….LBJ refused Israel’s request for military aid in 1967 in advance of clear indications of Arab intentions. Stuck in the Vietnam quagmire of his own false making in the Gulf of Tonkin, he didn’t want another war on his hands. He refused to sanction a preemptive strike and told the Israelis to “negotiate” with Arabs who were poised to strike.

Clinton, taking a page out of the Jimmy Carter playbook, forced Ehud Barak to come to Camp David and give Arafat 99% of what he asked for - and Arafat turned him down, going home to set off a bloody intifada. All in an attempt to redeem his stained presidency with a Carteresque Nobel Peace Prize. Oh, and how did Clinton engineer those meetings? By sending his own political operatives into Israel to interfere in their elections to get Barsk elected. Once all this became clear, Israel threw out Barsk and brought in Ariel Sharon.

Obama started off his first term by giving his very first presser to Al Jazeera, made Netanyahu use the White House back door when he came to visit, made a deal with Iran giving them billions in currency that he admitted he knew would be used in terrorism and gave the mullahs a glide path to a gradual anti-Israel nuke.

And who negotiated that deal for Obama? Joe Biden who immediately began to suck up by reinstating the deal with Iran that Trump wisely pulled out of and agreed to lighten sanctions, all without any action by Iran who continues their slow walk to nuclear weapons as the mullahs laugh in his face and refuse to accept his surrender to them. And then he agrees to send Hamas nearly a quarter billion in aid that Trump cut off because of continued terror and you wonder why rockets fly?

And your talk about the Israeli behavior in East Jerusalem isn’t spot on either and you are too smart to play the Biden deer in the headlights look to not know you are not giving the whole or true story. You leave out that the current issues in East Jerusalem that are causing all hub bub are about Jews seeking to reclaim real estate that they and their families owned for 150 years or so before the 1948 war. That Jordan took it from them and kicked them out and registered the property in the names of Arabs. And that after recovering Jerusalem in 1967, the evicted Jews began legal proceedings to recover what was taken from them. That is what this is all about - people seeking to secure their rights to property in a court of law.

James Baker once said of Israel that the GOP shouldn’t spend too much energy supporting Israel because no matter how much Republicans support them they always voted against them.

And he was right. Nixon saved Israel in 1973 - after he had faced the electorate for the last time even after not receiving much of their support. Trump moved the embassy to Jerusalem, cut off aid to the Palestinians, recognized Israeli ownership of the Golan, and brokered relations with 4 Arab countries that had refused to recognize Israel as a country since 1948. And if you take away the ultra Orthodox vote, assimilated American Jews barely voted for him.

And the Palestinians? They have been bloodthirsty for years. They almost single handedly defined modern terrorism. Airplane hijackings, airplane and bus bombs, Munich and all the rest. They store and shoot rockets in neighborhoods hoping that they will attract retailiation that will give them sympathetic pictures of dead children and hospital patients. Israel defends itself with force, they don’t initiate force.

But you know all this…..

Expand full comment

Wow. A lot to unpack and several lifetimes of grievances but hey - that is your right. You're characterization of Truman is chirlish baby shit talk. Any racialist can cherry pick Truman's habit of speaking freely and doing so as a liberal of his day - but he still integrated the military and that was far more vital that Jackie Robinson or Branch Rickey - who besides SNICK and MLK seem to have been the only instrumental institutions to try and fight endemic racism.

There is no Israel without Truman - and no president ever paid as dear a price for supporting Jews - so you can just take the quotes and shove em up your ass Rick. You are bastardizing history and I won't stand by for it. No American - any American - did more for the Jewish people and the Jewish state - so fuck you.

I love the Jewish people but often hear this kind lying shit. Not everyone is a history clueless dope incapable of judging these important figures with in the context of their own time....

With the length of you're many complaints its amazing you get out of bed in the morning - or more to the point - why do you? Just to add one more inane complaint to the list you have from here to the moon.

Get over yourself.

Expand full comment

I watched a documentary on civil rights recently (if I could remember its name I’d have mentioned it) and the background to Truman’s integrating the armed forces had much to do with trying to avoid another nationwide Pullman strike. Most people act out of mixed motives and politicians theme to act out of mixed political interests. So it’s possible that the threat from A. Phillip Randolph and others did push Truman.

As to Truman making the US the first to recognize Israel (just beating out the Soviet Union), again mixed motives. Truman, as we all know, had a very uphill battle for re-election in 1948 and NY had the largest number of electoral college votes. It also had a very politically active Newish population that Truman needed to keep onside if he was to have any hope to win. So his decision was swayed likely more by electoral considerations than by his former partner’s famous White House visit or some general love of Israel. This also explains something I wondered about: after recognizing Israel, the US implemented an arms embargo on Israel and refused to assist in any real sense until after the Six Day War. Oddly from today’s perspective, France was Israel’s major supporter, followed by the UK.

So, it may just be that the memory of Truman as a huge supporter of Israel and the Jews is a sentimental wish fulfilling but essentially inaccurate memory on par perhaps with the one that finds Britain helping birth the Jewish state when the reality was it more often violated its obligations under the Mandate toward the Jews than adhered to them. Memory can play tricks ... and I still can’t remember the name of that documentary.

Expand full comment

Abject nonsense Knapp - propagandizing from the school of I.F Stone & Howard Zinn....

You have a mentally challenged view of history - aka - learning disabled whose brain chemistry has sentenced him to a 12 yr-olds version of epic events.

France as a champion - but the US as the specter of self-interest? Charlie de Gaulle had even more of a dispassionate view of cultures and peoples other than Gaul and a driven pathology than anything Nixon did before or after the 6 days war.

Your grand 'sweep' over the entire 20th century as it pertains to Palestine and Israel is like some paint by numbers kiddie place mat at IHOP dude...get real.

Not one mention beyond a psycho like de Gaulle of a single significant figure in the entire non-sensical dismissive take on why Truman was just this oaf from Independence who got lucky and didn't have a clue.

These stupid remarks were common 'conventional wisdom' about Truman by historians (most of whom where Camelot afficionados - hence Kennedy hagiographers) who until Nixon - and the time necessary to reveal his importance - that ranking rose to where it is now - among the most prominence of all modern Presidents.

American Jewry know the importance - and that was and remains enough to call out dopes like you C.K.

Expand full comment

Sorry the facts so disturbed you. In the Six Day War, the IAF jet fighters were of overwhelmingly French manufacture while the IDF main battle tank was British. Only after that war, de Gaulle cut off future arms shipments to Israel as, in part, “punishment” for ignoring his warning not to attack preemptively. Israel did successfully “liberate” some small ships from the French port of Cherbourg it had bought and that France tried to embargo. De Gaulle also gave a speech that was seen as antisemitic but by then he had already decided on a more pro-Arab stance. It is perhaps related that the US stepped in at this point and became Israel’s main arms supplier.

The through line is that no country acts on the international stage for sentimental reasons. When a nation sees that supporting Israel is in their national interests, they support it. When it’s no longer the case, then they don’t.

Beyond that, I won’t bother responding in kind to your invective, as it’s a pointless exercise.

Expand full comment

First off, no one here is talking about blacks. Second of all “no Jew has ever been in my house?” “the Jews don’t have anything on Hitler or Stalin”?

Those were written in his personal diary in his own hand, using his own words and you say that’s all misdirection? That he actually loved the Jews?

All this stuff is just a bunch of lies?

Expand full comment

Nixon was crucified on much worse because he was under the delusion that what he said would be his - on tape -for his pick of historian to scrub and rinse and spin just has it had always been AND WAS FOR KENNEDY AND LBJ...AND EVERY OTHER PROGRESSIVE RIGHT UP TO THE CRIMINAL CRIME FAMILIES OBAMA AND BIDEN...

Just on the context Rick...when he wrote what he said - often decades earlier - WHEN THE ENGRAINED ANTI-SEMITISM WAS AS DEEP AS RACIAL EMNITY - and yet I argue -despite his willingness to spout off just as so many felt - HE MADE A DIFFERENCE BECAUSE HE MADE THE HARD POLITICAL CHOICES...

A hack like you will never give him that. So What? History is there for anyone to see regardless of the thin-skinned whinny bitching you indulge in.

Nixon often was a bigoted ass [- but you know what HE GOT BUSSING DONE DUDE - AND SUFFERED A SHITSTORM FOR IT - and he did more for black families than anything LBJ did by way of Great Society programing - unless you gage it by crony capitialism and the monies thrown down a rat hole to a few venders on Vista or hairdressing schools and the like...Same with Dept of Interior and the EPA....

Expand full comment

Yes Rick...there are lies...lies of omission...and damn lies and you're original post is FULL ....OF....THEM....

AND THUS....SHIT

Expand full comment

Wow.

Expand full comment

Bravo Glenn and thank you.

There will be well orchestrated and choreographed campaign, full of "facts" and lies, against you even in this enlightened group of readers.

Always the same -- for 70+ years.

Let's remember -- a portion of the annual huge "foreign assistance to Israel" is always returned to pockets of US politicians. Therefore, we might absolutely hate anything - Iranian whose democratically elected secular government and US-educated economist President we over-through decades ago -- still very fresh memory of every Iranian.

Nothing but rivers of blood and suffering of millions that the coming avalanche of "criticism" will try to whitewash

Expand full comment

Why engage right wing MAGA Israel supporters? Just have Bari Weiss on. I'd love to see the 2 of you go at it on this.

Expand full comment
author

I've talked to Bari over the last year about a bunch of things and would definitely be willing to talk to her about this.

Expand full comment

I would pay extra to watch that discussion.

Expand full comment

This is something those of us who don't know what to believe or what is true really need. Look, I lived in Israel in the 90's and I am still confused. You and Bari seem to have a very different understanding of the facts. I respect and trust both of you so I, for one, would be beyond grateful to hear/read a conversation between the two of you!

Expand full comment

Thank you !! Bari Weiss who in her sub-stack blog sings odes about her adoration of extreme racist Likudnik politician -- her "hero"

Elie Wiesel's Israeli propaganda and the myth of Soviet genocide against the Jews

His book "The Jews of Silence" was created as part of Israel’s covert propaganda and influence program targeting American Jews.

Elie Wiesel's Israeli propaganda and the myth of Soviet genocide against the Jews - Immigrants as a Weapon (substack.com)

Expand full comment

Oy gevalt!

Expand full comment

Clarification:

The extreme racist Likudnik politician Barri Weiss absolutely adores is -- Natan Sharansky

That Elie Wiesel is in the same racist category goes without saying.

Expand full comment

Oy vey!

Expand full comment

Oy racist dreck

Expand full comment

Clarification:

The extreme racist Likudnik politician Barri Weiss absolutely adores is -- Natan Sharansky

That Elie Wiesel is in the same racist category goes without saying.

Expand full comment

Mark, you are just parroting left wing talking points to deflect from the meat of Glenn's article showing this behavior is coming from the left, not the right.

What you should be asking is why engage left wing DNC voters who support Louis Farrakhan or Ilhan Omar and their repeated anti-semitic behavior and speech? Clearly these people have proven they are racists and anti-semites.

Even the SPLC labels Farrakhan a hate criminal but we have yet to see a single DNC politician denounce him and the nation.

Expand full comment

I don't think I parroted anything. I challenged Glenn to reflect on his obvious anti Israel and pro Palestinian bias in the context of an article that appeared in NRO today. I fully support Glenn's engagement with MAGA Israel supporters but think Bari Weiss would make a really provocative conversation partner on this subject. Bari is neither MAGA nor a left wing version of MAGA. She is a vocal and well informed supporter of Israel and on the front lines of fighting against antisemitism.

I agree with your comments about DNC voters supporting Farrakhan and the squad and I wish Glenn would forcefully object to these folks.

I think we are on the same wavelength, but maybe not.

Expand full comment

I tire of you and other posters constantly making the comment section about right wingers when the articles are about the left, the DNC and the media, almost exclusively.

Its the same fucking bullshit tactic of the groups I just mentioned. To associate and deflect away from the actual conversation which is important and damaging to the DNC coalition.

Let me summarize:

Stop mentioning Bari Weiss, stop mentioning right wing, stop mentioning MAGA and lets get back to the article which was about AOC and how the DNC leadership is responsible for the very things their members are complaining about in regards to Israel, and we can stop deflecting, and narrative changing from that.

Expand full comment

You know something..................go fuck yourself asshole.

Expand full comment

That would be interesting

Expand full comment

I wish I could be as calm in replying to nit-witted anti-intellectuals as that poster boy for Zionist Israel. I agree with your essay Mr. Greenwal.

Expand full comment

Eat shit, you poseur.

The Mullahs running Iran can publicly call for the murder of all the Jews of Israel and none of you limp dicks patting yourselves on the back for your online warrior status would make a whimper.

Those supporting Israel don’t murder dissenters. That’s why you lick dookie covered hairy Imam butt cheeks.

An intellectual, hahahahaha! You fancy yourself an intellectual that is just too far by the racist rhetoric.

Sure you are limp dick.

Expand full comment

A little detail for our Galleta rabid racist:

Iran NEVER called for murder of Jewish people -- that appeared only in Israeli "translation" - served to eager US media

Expand full comment

Islam is a religion, not a race.

I don’t care how many of you posturing limp dicked ‘tards attempt to label me, the truth is Islamic countries are lynching homos to the glory of their sky Gawd daily. I detest that.

I will never pretend Islam has created equally productive societies with civil rights for their people until there actually is a tolerant Islamic society.

I am not going to engage in Iran discussions.

Like Sarsour says, you could get zero per cent interest on your credit cards. I could get hung from a crane.

Expand full comment

Still - try to get Viagra to help yourself - you are obsessed with your weakness

Expand full comment

No, I merely recognize dim-witted people like you. It is too easy. Grow up.

Expand full comment

Sure you do limp dick ... get on down to lick some more dookie off the hairy Imam butt cheeks you low iq loser ‘tard

Expand full comment

You are so funny. It gave me a good belly laugh today - and I needed humor today watching Zionist Isreal again follow their God's orders and murder their enemies. After all your God is a mass murderer supreme. Look at how many times your God engaged in mass murder to cleanse the Earth - of Jewish people who sinned against their God. No thanks. You offer me nothing but a possibility that you will kneel and do as you describe. You must really enjoy that kind of sex. That is ok; this is America and behind closed doors you can enjoy the kind of sex that you enjoy. Thanks for the good laugh - honestly, I needed it.

Expand full comment

Oy rabid racist" -- GG 's article was on AOC's role in DNC.

As for few facts see below:

Palestinian children killed by Israel: The human dimension – April 26, 2021

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1YmQC9uSlM

Biden Admin Neutral On Child Murder + Max Blumenthal outstanding overview

https://youtu.be/7dbLAiEdQv4

Expand full comment

Please get some help-- or tell the troll farm to pay you more so you can

Expand full comment

Gosh, Carol Jones, thanks so much for the advice. Just what I was hoping for today.

Expand full comment

'But I hope I have a readership that does not want me merely to echo what they already think, but which trusts I'm going to always be honest about what I see and think and not try to aggrandize anyone. I'm more than willing to engage critics -- as I said, I'm talking to a couple right-wing MAGA Israel supporters to have on to explore these questions -- but to me, the value of this independent platform is not that I am a puppet for anyone side or faction but will also endeavor to tell you what I think and see, and I've always had a readership that could tolerate that kind of dissent and divergence from their strongly held views because they know I come by mine honestly and with an attempt to be scrupulous with the facts.'

We are 98% on opposite sides but that doesn't affect looking forward to the challenge...We all appreciate you skill and dedication - thanks again Glenn and keep up the outstanding fact based Journo...

Expand full comment

Thank you.

BTW, my dentist is an Indian from Uganda. Uganda was to be "Israel" in case that colonization of Palestine fails. You probably know that -- one must admire the strength of Zionist vision for a Jewish state.

Expand full comment

Let see, so far in this thread you have:

- Called genocides against the Jews "fake"

- Spoke in condescending tones and strawman arguments about the "Zionist" state.

- Accused Israel of building a wall to separate Palestinian children from Israel children instead of protecting them from the numerous rockets/mortar/knife/suicide attacks

Thats just in the last 30 minutes.

Given this informaiton, I'm pretty sure you can be found standing next to David Duke on weekends all garbed in the same clothing.

Don't bother responding, I have no further time for racist pieces of shit.

Expand full comment

Oy racist dreck.

Palestinian children killed by Israel: The human dimension – April 26, 2021

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1YmQC9uSlM

Biden Admin Neutral On Child Murder + Max Blumenthal outstanding overview

https://youtu.be/7dbLAiEdQv4

Expand full comment

The Zionists rejected Uganda (and a few other places) for the simple reason it wasn't Palestine.

Expand full comment

It was popularly called the Uganda option but the country that was in fact meant was today’s Kenya. That option was a non-starter and rejected outright because there was no Jewish connection to that African land and the only objective that made sense was the restoration of the Jewish people to their historical homeland - which was what eventually happened.

Expand full comment

Thank you VERY much. So it was Kenya - not Uganda.

One should give credit for the vision and persistence of Zionists -- the horror of terror, really a slow genocide, of Palestinians notwithstanding...

Expand full comment

“Really a slow genocide”

What percentage of Palestinians were decimated in this slow genocide?

Expand full comment

"It'd be easier for me to just not write about this. But I hope I have a readership that does not want me merely to echo what they already think, but which trusts I'm going to always be honest about what I see and think and not try to aggrandize anyone."

FWIW, I'm glad you stand for what you believe it, and more importantly, you don't censor yourself. I don't agree with you on this one. I appreciate the concept of getting out of the corpo-militaristic hegemony it seems like the US has fallen into (and has been since Eisenhower's warning...) - in this case, Israel is a little democracy beset by a lot of enemies - though Trump's foreign policy has started to ease that burden a bit.

Having said that, you no doubt will lose some fair weather readers, but I think your more intelligent ones will appreciate your stand for honest journalism, even if your personal opinions make a showing now and then.

Expand full comment

Here's a MAGA opinion: Israel/Palestine ought to be treated the same as any other international conflict of similar magnitude. I'd prefer to see less of our dollars spent there. That's all.

And, the obligatory thanks for what you do. Deeply appreciated.

Expand full comment

basically, call it syria and yemen and ignore it. Please, dear Gd.

Expand full comment

Glenn, I agree that the situation in Gaza miserable for the average Palestinian, but what do you suppose would happen to the Jews if the Palestinians were to prevail in a military conflict with Israel?

If the Palestinians gained the upper hand, I'm fairly certain (based on what Palestinian leaders have said in the past) that they would annihilate Israel and slaughter the Jews. The only thing stopping them is the fact that Israel dominates them militarily.

There's room to criticize Israel, but let's not kid ourselves, Israel treats the Palestinians better than the Palestinians would treat the Jews if Israel's military advantage were reversed.

If the Palestinians were to prevail, the human rights abuses they would perpetrate against the Jews would dwarf any mistreatment the Palestinians are enduring at the hands of Israel today.

Israel is the lesser of two evils. I would prefer it if the United States stayed out of the middle east entirely, but if we're going to get involved and support one faction or the other, Israel is more deserving of our support.

Expand full comment

I see your point. Perhaps using gas chambers would speed up getting rid of Palestinians. Noble thought also -- GG as Jewish should be ashamed that he doesn't think as you... I see - you are such a "decent" and compassionate human being

Palestinian children killed by Israel: The human dimension – April 26, 2021

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1YmQC9uSlM

Biden Admin Neutral On Child Murder + Max Blumenthal outstanding overview

https://youtu.be/7dbLAiEdQv4

Expand full comment

wow its like there is a big writing campaign. Last gasp Netanyahu?

Expand full comment

Carol, hundreds of missile fired into residential neighborhoods may well lead to much more than a last gap for Netanyahu. Events may well strengthen Likud and Netanyahu.

Expand full comment

That's in fact is circulated as one reason for this flareup. In any case, it wouldn't happen unless somebody was in on something.

Expand full comment

Yeah...Netanyahu is really Hamas...and he's sending thousands of rockets from Gaza...Hamas and Netanyahus govt faction are one...what??? Boi check ur brain it's on the floor next to you

Expand full comment

"I'm well-aware that a sizable chunk of my readership here -- perhaps the majority -- disagrees with my views on Israel and Palestine (though my views are consistent with my broader anti-militarism/anti-imperialism stand)." I agree with your astute appraisal of AOC. However, I think you might do well to reconsider your broader stance which seems a bit idealistic--although as with so many others here, I appreciate the debate. Sadly, we do not live in a world where we can be without boarders or a strong military. I have been to Israel (a bigger topic) and I just spent the last almost three years living in Egypt. As a child of ten my family was traveling the world in a bright red VW van with a big USA sticker on it when we just happened to find ourselves in Cairo days before the 6 Day War. I saw with my own eyes the hatred and the screams to annihilate Israel, at the same time screaming Israel does not exist. We ended up escaping out of Syria into Turkey right before the borders were closed. I am a writer on Substack and will be publishing a piece about this and the broader implications for today, on Friday. The Palestinians are used as pawns by their own leaders, Hamas, who refuse the first step toward the negotiating table: to acknowledge Israel exists. Even the Arab States have grown weary of this, as well as Hamas' alignment with Iran, which is why Trump was able to make his historic peace deal. And it truly was historic, sadly not given the credit it deserved. And now, here we are, not long into Biden's administration and the world has become ever more unstable on many fronts. The fact is, Israel is a tiny country surrounded by hungry wolves who hate it with a hatred beyond reason. When Israel is threatened it must hit back tenfold. Any sign of weakness and it will be devoured. This is an unfortunate human condition and we might wonder why humans do this to one another in the first place. That is a bigger question. But, although I see the tragedy of the Palestinian people, I must stand with Israel. My recent time in Egypt was illuminating--won't go into more detail here. But honestly, I would much rather live under any Israeli leader than Hamas.

Expand full comment

The article was on AOC's role in DNC...

As for few facts on US/Israel terror on Palestinians:

Palestinian children killed by Israel: The human dimension – April 26, 2021

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1YmQC9uSlM

Biden Admin Neutral On Child Murder + Max Blumenthal outstanding overview

https://youtu.be/7dbLAiEdQv4

Expand full comment

I would like to say, good luck with your article, but I for one will not read it, since it is quite obvious in what you have written here you are coming from a highly biased position. However I do hope you mention the disproportionate death rates among Israeli's and those of the Palestinian people through their years of conflict, as well as the destruction and theft of Palestinian lands. Not unusual since Israel has a strong military, while the Palestinians have none. For a tiny country surrounded by wolves they have killed a lot of people, and grabbed a lot of land and resources in the process, with almost total support from the US. I do hope you will mention  in the latest cycle of bloodshed it began with the Israeli government's plans to evict Palestinians from their homes in the Sheikh Jarrah neighborhood of occupied East Jerusalem, to make way for Israeli settlers which is against international law, and in by defending what is there's they have been assaulted brutally.   Good luck.

Expand full comment

No worries, Fran. I leave my further response for my article. Thanks for the well wishes.

Expand full comment

Understood but please respond to my earlier query re this article by Eliot Abrams in NRO today. I can live with your bias but please don't ignore facts.

https://www.nationalreview.com/2021/05/israel-erupts-cutting-through-the-misinformation-surrounding-part-of-this-conflict/?utm_source=recirc-desktop&utm_medium=homepage&utm_campaign=river&utm_content=featured-content-trending&utm_term=first

Expand full comment
author

Eliot Abrams is a dogmatic neocon and I know full well what his views are on Israel and Gaza. I'll read the article but, to be honest, I'm more interested in engaging with less pro-war doctrinal Israel supporters than the Bill Kristols and David Frums of the world. The faction on the right that interests me more is the America First/MAGA faction. Many are not on board with pro-Israel dogma but some are. Those are the people I'm interested in engaging.

Expand full comment

If the DNC would condemn Louis Farrakhan and the nation for their anti-semitic views, it would go a long way to stopping the growing spread of anti-semitism in the inner cities. Here is just this week's anti-semitic behavior from the african-american/muslim community.

https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/story/2021-05-10/lakeith-stanfield-apologizes-for-anti-semitic-clubhouse

Here is more of the same growing anti-semitic behavior in the inner cities, fueled by the Nation of Hate.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/nick-cannon-promotes-anti-semitic-conspiracy-theories-with-former-public-enemy-rapper

At some point the DNC should be willing to condemn their own constituents for their anti-semitic behavior, but I wont hold my breath. They will just yell more about how Donald Trump is a white supremacist (he was arguably the most pro-israel president ever) while ignoring the growing racism from within their own constituents.

Expand full comment

Hi are you writing from 1980? It is 2021-- this column was about AOC's hypocrisy-- please get with the program

Expand full comment

If he was writing from 1980, he would have said Ronald Reagan, not Donald Trump. But Louis Farrakhan, now he's still a racist, isn't he. And anti-semitic? When did that start, a couple millenia ago?

Expand full comment

Perhaps you didn't actually read my comment? Its mentioning how DNC leadership is unwilling to challenge the people pushing a lot of the anti-semitic behavior.

My comments and citations are 100% in line with the article. Thanks for playing.

Expand full comment

Glenn, you're being kind to Abrahms)))). He tried to covered up the Salvadoran death squads trained under Reagan, was deeply involved in Iran Contra, lied and withheld information to Congress, and was a Trump appointee. Given that HRC is a big Abrahms fan tells me she doesn't find DT as foul as she says.

Expand full comment

Exactly-- what the heck ...

Expand full comment

I’m MAGA so would love to hear it. We desperately want NO MORE WARS especially Middle East wars. Obviously there are differences of opinion in MAGA land too

Expand full comment

Glenn, I've become a real fan and switched to Founding Member but your ad hominem attack is disappointing. I have come to expect better from you.

Expand full comment
author

It's not ad hominem. One of the problems with this Israel debate is that it's been the same arguments for decades without any movement. We all have to pick and choose which critiques and critics we think are worth. engaging, and all I'm saying is that I think it's less fruitful to engage with long-standing predictable neocon dogma than more evolving and flexible MAGA/America-First defenses of Israel.

Expand full comment

Israel - pro-Democracy, pro-women's rights (They had a female leader in 1969 ffs), has already beaten the dogshit out of multiple of the muslim attackers in the 6 day war, is who I stand with.

I won't pretend they don't have skeletons in their closet like every country, but I gladly stand with those who stand for democracy and equal rights.

America doesn't stand with Israel because they are jews, we stand with them because they have been long supporters of democracy in a region known for tyranny, despotism and oppression.

Expand full comment

It’s not a defense of Israel, it’s a defense of democracy and freedom over theocratic lunatics.

Expand full comment

Glenn,

I think you make a false assumption about a lot of MAGA/America-First thinkers. I voted Trump in 2016/2020, but mostly because he was the only choice available after the primaries. (Rubio in 2016 primaries, FWIW.)

I also don't think "Trumpism" or "MAGA" is really an articulated political philosophy. It certainly can't be summarized as simply as "America First, Everyone else go to hell". (Not what you've said, but I think you're implying that when you criticize a few billion sent to Israel in the face of the massive trillions that Biden wants to spend...)

Anyone can make the argument that, "how can we send billions to Israel when we have _________ here??" - which is a false dichotomy. It's loosely equivalent to the "If we can put a man on the moon, then we can _________."

Long and short, I think you can convince people that uncritically sending Israel money is one thing - but most Americans look at Israel first and foremost as a Democracy (which should be defended), and a big chunk also look at it in Biblical terms as the chosen state of God (again, ditto, as written in scripture).

Between those two bedrock beliefs, there's not a lot of daylight for "Hey, how come you can be MAGA/America first and still approve of sending money to Israel??"

Lastly, and quite obviously, getting back to Trumpism, if Trump had a foreign policy, it can be summarized as: Tariffs, "Getting even with China who has been abusing us", "Build a wall!" and "We love Israel, heck, half my family is jewish!"

Not trying to criticize any pro-anti-Trump person, just trying to elaborate on something Glenn has posted about repeatedly (and posted on Youtube).

Expand full comment

Glenn, your without any movement isn’t really accurate. Israel picked up and left Gaza, bulldozing Jewish settlements. They gave back self rule to Gaza and the West Bank. They gave Arabs the franchise and they have members in the Knesset. They made peace with Egypt and Jordan and returned the Sinai - all of which got Anwar Sadat assassinated. Ehud Barak was willing to give Arafat 99% of what the Palestinians wanted and didn’t want to end up the same way, so he declined and touched off a bloody intifada.

The organizing documents of Palestinian organizations still call for the destruction of Israel. Guys like Sharon and Netanyahu have been PM for a long time because of the refusal of the Palestinians to make peace and their constant ability to find a hot blooded ally to seek to destroy them.

Expand full comment

The Israeli-Palestinian troubles has a personal dimension for me. I am an American Jew. One of my cousins went to Israel and fell in love with a Palestinian Christian. They have been married for over 20 years (maybe over 30) and have several children. Hanna is a vocal critic of Israeli politics and a strong advocate for Palestinian rights. I disagree with many of his views, but he is honest.

So I have to view Israel and its policies with a critical eye.

Expand full comment

Okay, points well taken but it came across to me as ad hominem when you dismissed the article I linked as neocon dogma before even reading it.

In any event I am interested in your views after you have had time to read it.

Expand full comment

"...your ad hominem attack..."

On AOC? (i.e. are you being sarcastic?)

Expand full comment

No, I felt dismissing Eliot Abrams because he is a Neocon was ad hominem.

Expand full comment

Ah another sith lord who cannot handle even listening to dissenting opinions on other's opinions on things.

I can't imagine the ego you must have. Have you ever done LSD?

Expand full comment