I know. My comment wasn't meant to try to persuade you out of your "Trump rut". You've overdosed on your hatred (no matter how justified) of the Democrats. So much so that you appear to be an "influencer", hired by Trump to improve his image.
BTW: your substack report on voting machines has some good information in it that others should examine. The only problem is your demented conclusion that Trump was robbed -- as if every election since 2020 has been "honest".
An excellent example of how to take the "truth" and transform it into meaningless propaganda.
I do recommend others read it and compare your points of fact with those of Greg Palast and Brad Friedman.
Are you really an onion? Or is that simply a moniker you use on the internet?
When I am confronted by anonymous cretains such as Iconoclast my first reacion is that the person is likely a disinformant agent. It seems to me that they might likely be from a foreign country playing at being an American.
These are admittedly just suspicions. I am even suspicious of you, and your German surname. Why? because of your pretense to be equally against Biden and Trump. It is a ruse that both you and your anonymous pal Icono pose at.
You are both equally biased against Trump. I simply do not believe that either of you are not pro Biden masquerading as "independent minded" thinkers.
These are my conclusions. They will not be swayed by denials from either one of you clowns.
If the conclusions are "rubbish" maybe you can tell us why. The conclusions of fraud have considerable circumstantial evidence. The smoking gun hasn't appeared yet, but probably will. Conclusions based on weight of evidence aren't gospel, just opinions. The constructive disagreement rebuts, not attacks.
Where is a single court case that Trump won? Some of those judges were his appointees.
My comment should have read:
"as if every election since *2000* has been 'honest'". /s
Whitten is pushing the Trump really won line because he's a MAGA-man.
My point has always been that Trump won because -this time- the Democrats (finally) cheated better than the Republicans.
If Whitten honestly wanted to support fair elections, we wouldn't have any argument. The evidence of Electoral Fraud is so blatant that one would have to be blind to not see it. But to offer up these ridiculous conspiracies like the phony ballots being "found" under a table, is foolish. The "fix" was in long, long before election night.
Plenty of evidence the election was corrupted, and plenty that the courts are corrupted. T h one who deny the corruption are either naive or complicit.
Zwieble, I don't give a shit what you think.
\\][//
I know. My comment wasn't meant to try to persuade you out of your "Trump rut". You've overdosed on your hatred (no matter how justified) of the Democrats. So much so that you appear to be an "influencer", hired by Trump to improve his image.
BTW: your substack report on voting machines has some good information in it that others should examine. The only problem is your demented conclusion that Trump was robbed -- as if every election since 2020 has been "honest".
An excellent example of how to take the "truth" and transform it into meaningless propaganda.
I do recommend others read it and compare your points of fact with those of Greg Palast and Brad Friedman.
Your conclusions though -- rubbish.
Zwiebel, Who is Iconoclast?
You seem to be pals. Do you know his real name?
Are you really an onion? Or is that simply a moniker you use on the internet?
When I am confronted by anonymous cretains such as Iconoclast my first reacion is that the person is likely a disinformant agent. It seems to me that they might likely be from a foreign country playing at being an American.
These are admittedly just suspicions. I am even suspicious of you, and your German surname. Why? because of your pretense to be equally against Biden and Trump. It is a ruse that both you and your anonymous pal Icono pose at.
You are both equally biased against Trump. I simply do not believe that either of you are not pro Biden masquerading as "independent minded" thinkers.
These are my conclusions. They will not be swayed by denials from either one of you clowns.
any more of your repies to me will be ignored.
\\][//
I encourage everyone to read the article and think for themselves.
I would never ask that of you though Zwiebel, you are too indoctrinated to see the basic truth anywhere.
Thanks for the animal crackers.
\\][//
If the conclusions are "rubbish" maybe you can tell us why. The conclusions of fraud have considerable circumstantial evidence. The smoking gun hasn't appeared yet, but probably will. Conclusions based on weight of evidence aren't gospel, just opinions. The constructive disagreement rebuts, not attacks.
Where is a single court case that Trump won? Some of those judges were his appointees.
My comment should have read:
"as if every election since *2000* has been 'honest'". /s
Whitten is pushing the Trump really won line because he's a MAGA-man.
My point has always been that Trump won because -this time- the Democrats (finally) cheated better than the Republicans.
If Whitten honestly wanted to support fair elections, we wouldn't have any argument. The evidence of Electoral Fraud is so blatant that one would have to be blind to not see it. But to offer up these ridiculous conspiracies like the phony ballots being "found" under a table, is foolish. The "fix" was in long, long before election night.
Plenty of evidence the election was corrupted, and plenty that the courts are corrupted. T h one who deny the corruption are either naive or complicit.
You might want to read Ed Snowden's latest article. But... Well, to be honest you wouldn't understand it. So never mind.