Yes actually. I am hoping that Covid will eventually dissipate and then become an endemic issue that we deal with like the flu. At that point, I don't think passports will be needed. Unfortunately we are not there yet, largely due to vaccination rates that are too low. In the current environment, I still want to know that my coworkers and fellow passengers are vaccinated.
Yes actually. I am hoping that Covid will eventually dissipate and then become an endemic issue that we deal with like the flu. At that point, I don't think passports will be needed. Unfortunately we are not there yet, largely due to vaccination rates that are too low. In the current environment, I still want to know that my coworkers and fellow passengers are vaccinated.
You can still contract covid once vaccinated and pass it on to the unvaccinated, for whom it is much more risky to get. There is even a small chance of having severe complications from covid even when vaccinated.
Keep talking with the unclean and eventually you will come to realize there is safe and effective early treatment to avoid tragedies like that. That poor guy did not need to die.
As McCullough has described it best, we have a pandemic of the untreated. It's a crime against humanity.
Initial contact with the virus causes instances of cytokine storms in some people, totally unrelated to comorbitites. Cytokine storms are also completely unpredictable. Young, heathy people have in fact died of cytokine storms precipitated by exposure to the virus.
Cytokine storms are not communicable.
My greatest concern when my adult kids each got it was the chance of cytokine storms. Thankfully they all are fine, completely asymptomatic with robust natural immunity (not just antibodies either.)
I feel for those who lost someone to a cytokine storm. ItтАЩs sudden and brutal and an ugly way to die. ItтАЩs also inevitable when the human immune system is presented a nice pathogen.
Agreed. Kind of a nebulous word. Seems odd to use it to try to sell something. What do you think those that use "safe and effective" as adjectives for covaxes mean exactly, and how does that compare to what most think when they hear it?
If it reduces covid transmission and symptoms compared to a control group. The vaccines do that. They are effective. Pretty simple stuff here, I don't think academics are debating what the word effective means.
Double-blind controlled randomized placebo tests are exactly what is missing. They don't make the claims that the vaccines reduce the ability to contract or transmit the virus, only that they reduce the severity. The FDA is now claiming it will take 75 years for them to redact and release the data on which they approved the Pfizer vaccine. But because they aborted the 3 yr study at 6 mos and allowed Pfizer to give the vaccine to the control group, the only long-term data is "in the wild." During those 6 mos, however, more people died in the vaccine group than the placebo group. Pfizer claimed that it prevented 1 Covid death for 22,000 people (pathetic efficacy to begin with) but there were actually 5 more all-cause deaths in the vaccine group for cardiac arrest and congestive heart failure. That's a 42.8% increase in risk of death. This is in the fine-print of their own report. Virologists, including a Nobel laureate, warn of pathogen priming, that increases susceptibility when exposed to the virus. In 1966 US children were killed in the testing of another coronovirus vaccine for RSV because their immune systems were primed to overreact. It's not a virus that kills but our immune system's reaction to it. So far, in a Harvard study of 3000 US counties and 68 countries, higher vaccination rates are correlated with a spike in hospitalizations and deaths--among the vaccinated. If you have data on a reduction in covid transmission and symptoms compared to a control group, please post it.
Please share the "real points" about the vaccines. Are they actually vaccines? They appear to be simply the governments' initial steps towards creating a more compliant society. Why are actual, effective treatments for the disease being discouraged or even made unavailable? I thought the "point" of the so-called vaccines was to prevent COVID-19. They have proven incapable of doing so.
You are the Charles who has an email account at Peak.org, right?
If so, I've already written you about much of this via private email. And, there's more here in this thread, both from me and redge1657 that address this reasonably well.
As for your conjecture about "a more compliant society", where's your evidence? What's your argument? So far, all I can gather is you hate the public policy choices about this pandemic - that doesn't make it some kind of massive conspiracy. And, as I wrote you both in comments and in private email, I'm not happy about the public policies regarding the pandemic, I'm just upset about different aspects of it than you are, I'd guess... At any rate, I don't see any organized plot. Do you? Seems so.
As for this: "I thought the "point" of the so-called vaccines was to prevent COVID-19." The problem with that is the word "prevent." No, they're not designed this way and this is a key point that I wrote you about in a comment / reply back on the thread that was active when you and I first managed to email one another.
In short, what vaccines do is train your body to create the antibodies to fight off infection before you've been infected by the real thing. So, you get an infection and fight it off the same ole way your normal immune system would do it, but with a bit of help in the initial response, so the overall infection is shorter, and is less severe. (SOME small minority of vaccines provide "complete immunity," and SOME people want to push your buttons - or are just ignorant people repeating what someone else told them and claim that because these vaccines don't provide "complete immunity" they're therefore not vaccines and that's just flatly wrong.)
No time for more now, but you can feel free to write me or comment back here. But I have to get on with my day...
You have me mixed up with someone else. I never heard of Peak.org before just now. Regarding our increasingly servile and obedient society, have you ever had to take your shoes off before boarding a plane? Have you ever been forced to wear a mask to enter a store? We now have "health Nazis" that are quick to verbally attack those who think for themselves.
It has not been proven that there is a massive conspiracy; yet it is significant that Sweden stands alone as a nation relatively free of COVID deaths and Israel, home of the most obliging and cooperative citizens, is getting clobbered with COVID.
An actual vaccine targets a specific disease. The combination of human fetal cells and cholesterol being injected worldwide do no such thing.
These shots do not stop transmission or infection. They therefore actually are the main driver behind new variants. Read up on Geert VandenBossche on this issue. He literally used to work for GAVI and Bill and Melinda gates. Not exactly an anti vaxer....
Instead of retorting with unsupported statements, try providing some peer-reviewed sources (sans pharma funding and conflicts of interest) for your spurious claims next time.
Project much? Once again, all IтАЩm hearing from your camp are BigPharma talking points and ad hominem attacks. No evidence, peer-reviewed articles, or credible sources without conflicts of interest have been provided. YouтАЩre calling scientific publications like тАЬNature,тАЭ тАЬMedical Hypotheses,тАЭ and CDCтАЩs adverse events reporting database тАЬclickbaitтАЭ? If you took the time to read any of my articles (e.g., https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/letter-to-a-scientifically-minded), you would see I have cited hundreds if not thousands of reputable sources across my articles.
If you are too afraid to examine scientific evidence that punctures your delusional narrative, fine. Just donтАЩt pretend youтАЩre the one whoтАЩs pro-science and IтАЩm the one whoтАЩs anti-science.
This is laughable - you don't know squat about me, not even what you could have learned about me from my posts here.
I just happen to know a bit more than you do about this topic, apparently. And since you already don't really listen to what I write, I have no incentive to help you out.
You might want to borrow that mirror I gave Jeff yesterday.
If youтАЩre not тАЬtoo afraid to examine scientific evidence,тАЭ prove it. IтАЩd love to see that. Not one of you Covidians has been brave enough to take up the challenge I threw down yesterday. Read тАЬThe Real Anthony FauciтАЭ and come back with your counterarguments to anything you disagree with.
Or how about thisтАФtake a crowbar to your vacuum-sealed mind and crack it open to let a little oxygenating truth in. Once you do, you will no longer be able to prostrate yourself before your BigPharma godheads and you might just become brave enough to speak out against the pharmacide and totalitarianism you are presently championing like a rabid New Normal Nazi zealot.
ItтАЩs your choiceтАФyou can either side with totalitarian governments, extortionist megacorporations, and apartheidist Covidians, or you can join We the People in reclaiming our freedoms from the tyrants you are presently defending with every propaganda-scripted talking point you parrot.
I donтАЩt have time to continue down this rabbit-hole with you or the other willfully ignorant anti-science, anti-freedom, anti-human, anti-truth Covidians in this thread, so donтАЩt bother coming back at me until youтАЩve taken up the challenge.
Do you not see that leaders in Canada and Australia have already signed multi-year deals for boosters? We are not one more shot away from full immunity or the end of covid. This machine is just getting warmed up.
They have signed those details because they unfortunately will likely be necessary. I think the scientific consensus is that we will all likely need to get at least annual covid shots for the rest of our lives. My last comment clearly admits that I don't think there will ever be a real end to covid. That's what endemic means.
One point that I think people overlook is that vaccine mandates have existed for many decades. I have to show vaccination history for my kids to attend school, for example, and vaccine mandates for health care workers have existed long before covid as well. For these situations, I think long-term covid vaccine mandates make sense. For general work places and planes, I think you could make an argument to do away with them once we reach a reasonable level of control over covid. Even then, I think any private business should be allowed to implement whatever rules they wish.
You are making the classic logical fallacy of conflating traditional, sterilizing vaccines with this untested product (PfizerтАЩs own documents referred to it as such instead of a vaccineтАФuntil тАЬvaccineтАЭ was conveniently redefined to encompass this new, non-sterilizing, experimental technology).
Vaccines through history have gone through a 5-10 year safety approval process.
Did you know the industry has worked on developing a covid vaccine for decades? I have a feeling Pfizer knows what's going to happen to the Chinese and Russian shots that use traditional approaches, and it's not going to be good. With the new technology, we're going to find out with time and more boosters. Also notice that after decades of failure, everyone had a shot that works within months, as soon as liability was waived by governments.
All of the claims about long-term safety for covid shots are inferred from the history of approved vaccines which used different technology, and ignores the history of failed attempts.
There will be no end to the trillion-dollar COVID scheme and its accompanying tyranny because the global mass vaccination policy thwarted the development of natural herd immunity that was on the verge of being achieved a year ago (December 2020 тАЬMedical HypothesesтАЭ article, тАЬIs a COVID-19 Vaccine Developed by Nature Already at Work?тАЭ: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33059225/), and the vaccinated have now put the world at risk for far more virulent forms (e.g., Delta) due to selective pressure being put on the virus to mutate, as was predicted in this December 2020 тАЬNatureтАЭ magazine article (https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-03441-8):
тАЬMass vaccination campaigns will, for the first time, put enormous pressure on SARS-CoV-2 to adapt, and will select for any strain of the virus that might be able to escape immune defences. тАШWeтАЩve never seen a virus like this under selective pressure,тАЩ says Griffin. тАШSo we donтАЩt know how itтАЩs going to respond.тАЩтАЭ
So it is the global mass vaccination program and those who have been gullible enough to buy into this flim-flam that will keep COVID and the perpetual injection scam on repeat forever until we say NO to further reckless health policies and tyranny.
Margaret put her finger on the big issue. These mRNA jabs seem to PREVENT full natural immunity from developing post-infection. This is a dirty secret that will come out in coming months.
ME: Dr. Malone, when the vaccinated contract COVID after injection, do you know if they develop natural immunity in the same way the unvaccinated do, or is that process thwarted? (Granted, it may still be too early to make such a determination, and this article suggests it is still an unknown: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/articles/PMC8402626/)
If they can still develop antibodies, do you think the highly-transmissible and apparently innocuous Omicron has the potential to achieve the natural herd immunity that we appeared to be on the precipice of a year ago, according to this December 2020 тАЬMedical HypothesesтАЭ article, тАЬIs a COVID-19 Vaccine Developed by Nature Already at Work?тАЭ тАж
DR. MALONE: If vaccinated with a genetic vaccine that only encodes for one protein (spike), the vaccinated do not develop the same protection as those who have caught the disease. There are 29 proteins in SARS-CoV-2 -which the body will mount an immune response with natural infection.
I will personally die before I submit to mandatory annual shots. Never. Such a system can and will be abused. The only way governments can enforce such a regime is genocide against those who refuse. Considering current behavior in Austria, genocide seems to be the plan.
Yes actually. I am hoping that Covid will eventually dissipate and then become an endemic issue that we deal with like the flu. At that point, I don't think passports will be needed. Unfortunately we are not there yet, largely due to vaccination rates that are too low. In the current environment, I still want to know that my coworkers and fellow passengers are vaccinated.
If you are safely and effectively vaccinated, why does their status matter to you?
You can still contract covid once vaccinated and pass it on to the unvaccinated, for whom it is much more risky to get. There is even a small chance of having severe complications from covid even when vaccinated.
IтАЩve had Covid. IтАЩm not the least concerned about getting it again.
Why should I sign in to be an experimental subject in Phase 4 clinical trials?
You were lucky, others have not been. My best friend's daughter's husband caught it and died at 31 and he had no "comorbidities."
Keep talking with the unclean and eventually you will come to realize there is safe and effective early treatment to avoid tragedies like that. That poor guy did not need to die.
As McCullough has described it best, we have a pandemic of the untreated. It's a crime against humanity.
Initial contact with the virus causes instances of cytokine storms in some people, totally unrelated to comorbitites. Cytokine storms are also completely unpredictable. Young, heathy people have in fact died of cytokine storms precipitated by exposure to the virus.
Cytokine storms are not communicable.
My greatest concern when my adult kids each got it was the chance of cytokine storms. Thankfully they all are fine, completely asymptomatic with robust natural immunity (not just antibodies either.)
I feel for those who lost someone to a cytokine storm. ItтАЩs sudden and brutal and an ugly way to die. ItтАЩs also inevitable when the human immune system is presented a nice pathogen.
**NOVEL PATHOGEN**
"Novel" is a euphemism for Lab Created.
I'll need to check my dictionary definition of effective.
Something does not have to work flawlessly to be considered effective.
Agreed. Kind of a nebulous word. Seems odd to use it to try to sell something. What do you think those that use "safe and effective" as adjectives for covaxes mean exactly, and how does that compare to what most think when they hear it?
If it reduces covid transmission and symptoms compared to a control group. The vaccines do that. They are effective. Pretty simple stuff here, I don't think academics are debating what the word effective means.
IтАЩm certain academics do not.
IтАЩd bet propagandists spent many an hour with focus groups deciding to use it however.
Double-blind controlled randomized placebo tests are exactly what is missing. They don't make the claims that the vaccines reduce the ability to contract or transmit the virus, only that they reduce the severity. The FDA is now claiming it will take 75 years for them to redact and release the data on which they approved the Pfizer vaccine. But because they aborted the 3 yr study at 6 mos and allowed Pfizer to give the vaccine to the control group, the only long-term data is "in the wild." During those 6 mos, however, more people died in the vaccine group than the placebo group. Pfizer claimed that it prevented 1 Covid death for 22,000 people (pathetic efficacy to begin with) but there were actually 5 more all-cause deaths in the vaccine group for cardiac arrest and congestive heart failure. That's a 42.8% increase in risk of death. This is in the fine-print of their own report. Virologists, including a Nobel laureate, warn of pathogen priming, that increases susceptibility when exposed to the virus. In 1966 US children were killed in the testing of another coronovirus vaccine for RSV because their immune systems were primed to overreact. It's not a virus that kills but our immune system's reaction to it. So far, in a Harvard study of 3000 US counties and 68 countries, higher vaccination rates are correlated with a spike in hospitalizations and deaths--among the vaccinated. If you have data on a reduction in covid transmission and symptoms compared to a control group, please post it.
And don't say that the vacced can pass it on via Twitter. https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/twitter-punish-users-who-claim-vaccinated-individuals-can-still-spread-covid-19
You fail to mention an obvious fact: After being "vaccinated" for COVID, you can catch COVID and pass it on to another injected sucker.
That's irrelevant to the real points about the vaccines. Please read more.
Please share the "real points" about the vaccines. Are they actually vaccines? They appear to be simply the governments' initial steps towards creating a more compliant society. Why are actual, effective treatments for the disease being discouraged or even made unavailable? I thought the "point" of the so-called vaccines was to prevent COVID-19. They have proven incapable of doing so.
You are the Charles who has an email account at Peak.org, right?
If so, I've already written you about much of this via private email. And, there's more here in this thread, both from me and redge1657 that address this reasonably well.
As for your conjecture about "a more compliant society", where's your evidence? What's your argument? So far, all I can gather is you hate the public policy choices about this pandemic - that doesn't make it some kind of massive conspiracy. And, as I wrote you both in comments and in private email, I'm not happy about the public policies regarding the pandemic, I'm just upset about different aspects of it than you are, I'd guess... At any rate, I don't see any organized plot. Do you? Seems so.
As for this: "I thought the "point" of the so-called vaccines was to prevent COVID-19." The problem with that is the word "prevent." No, they're not designed this way and this is a key point that I wrote you about in a comment / reply back on the thread that was active when you and I first managed to email one another.
In short, what vaccines do is train your body to create the antibodies to fight off infection before you've been infected by the real thing. So, you get an infection and fight it off the same ole way your normal immune system would do it, but with a bit of help in the initial response, so the overall infection is shorter, and is less severe. (SOME small minority of vaccines provide "complete immunity," and SOME people want to push your buttons - or are just ignorant people repeating what someone else told them and claim that because these vaccines don't provide "complete immunity" they're therefore not vaccines and that's just flatly wrong.)
No time for more now, but you can feel free to write me or comment back here. But I have to get on with my day...
You have me mixed up with someone else. I never heard of Peak.org before just now. Regarding our increasingly servile and obedient society, have you ever had to take your shoes off before boarding a plane? Have you ever been forced to wear a mask to enter a store? We now have "health Nazis" that are quick to verbally attack those who think for themselves.
It has not been proven that there is a massive conspiracy; yet it is significant that Sweden stands alone as a nation relatively free of COVID deaths and Israel, home of the most obliging and cooperative citizens, is getting clobbered with COVID.
An actual vaccine targets a specific disease. The combination of human fetal cells and cholesterol being injected worldwide do no such thing.
No, I am. We should probably resume our conversation.
These shots do not stop transmission or infection. They therefore actually are the main driver behind new variants. Read up on Geert VandenBossche on this issue. He literally used to work for GAVI and Bill and Melinda gates. Not exactly an anti vaxer....
Your first sentence is just not true sorry.
Your beloved CDC says otherwise, as do countless peer-reviewed studies and papers: тАЬBut what they can't do anymore is prevent transmission.тАЭ (https://www.cnet.com/health/breakthrough-covid-infections-in-fully-vaccinated-people-arent-so-rare-cdc-says/ and https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2021/08/06/cdc_director_vaccines_no_longer_prevent_you_from_spreading_covid.html#!)
Instead of retorting with unsupported statements, try providing some peer-reviewed sources (sans pharma funding and conflicts of interest) for your spurious claims next time.
You're biting on click-bait and, not being fully informed, you claim others are sharing "unsupported statements?" Hmmm...
Clear case of Dunning Kruger effect.
Just because you may know a couple of facts, doesn't mean you know enough for your conclusions, without additional pertinent facts, are valid.
Project much? Once again, all IтАЩm hearing from your camp are BigPharma talking points and ad hominem attacks. No evidence, peer-reviewed articles, or credible sources without conflicts of interest have been provided. YouтАЩre calling scientific publications like тАЬNature,тАЭ тАЬMedical Hypotheses,тАЭ and CDCтАЩs adverse events reporting database тАЬclickbaitтАЭ? If you took the time to read any of my articles (e.g., https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/letter-to-a-scientifically-minded), you would see I have cited hundreds if not thousands of reputable sources across my articles.
If you are too afraid to examine scientific evidence that punctures your delusional narrative, fine. Just donтАЩt pretend youтАЩre the one whoтАЩs pro-science and IтАЩm the one whoтАЩs anti-science.
You write:
"too afraid to examine scientific evidence"
This is laughable - you don't know squat about me, not even what you could have learned about me from my posts here.
I just happen to know a bit more than you do about this topic, apparently. And since you already don't really listen to what I write, I have no incentive to help you out.
You might want to borrow that mirror I gave Jeff yesterday.
If youтАЩre not тАЬtoo afraid to examine scientific evidence,тАЭ prove it. IтАЩd love to see that. Not one of you Covidians has been brave enough to take up the challenge I threw down yesterday. Read тАЬThe Real Anthony FauciтАЭ and come back with your counterarguments to anything you disagree with.
Or how about thisтАФtake a crowbar to your vacuum-sealed mind and crack it open to let a little oxygenating truth in. Once you do, you will no longer be able to prostrate yourself before your BigPharma godheads and you might just become brave enough to speak out against the pharmacide and totalitarianism you are presently championing like a rabid New Normal Nazi zealot.
ItтАЩs your choiceтАФyou can either side with totalitarian governments, extortionist megacorporations, and apartheidist Covidians, or you can join We the People in reclaiming our freedoms from the tyrants you are presently defending with every propaganda-scripted talking point you parrot.
I donтАЩt have time to continue down this rabbit-hole with you or the other willfully ignorant anti-science, anti-freedom, anti-human, anti-truth Covidians in this thread, so donтАЩt bother coming back at me until youтАЩve taken up the challenge.
Nor are his first two solid logic, should the first sentence to have actually been true.
Do you not see that leaders in Canada and Australia have already signed multi-year deals for boosters? We are not one more shot away from full immunity or the end of covid. This machine is just getting warmed up.
Do you know what leaky vaccines are?
They have signed those details because they unfortunately will likely be necessary. I think the scientific consensus is that we will all likely need to get at least annual covid shots for the rest of our lives. My last comment clearly admits that I don't think there will ever be a real end to covid. That's what endemic means.
There's a big difference between the living with the flu and government mandated shots for the rest of our lives.
One point that I think people overlook is that vaccine mandates have existed for many decades. I have to show vaccination history for my kids to attend school, for example, and vaccine mandates for health care workers have existed long before covid as well. For these situations, I think long-term covid vaccine mandates make sense. For general work places and planes, I think you could make an argument to do away with them once we reach a reasonable level of control over covid. Even then, I think any private business should be allowed to implement whatever rules they wish.
You are making the classic logical fallacy of conflating traditional, sterilizing vaccines with this untested product (PfizerтАЩs own documents referred to it as such instead of a vaccineтАФuntil тАЬvaccineтАЭ was conveniently redefined to encompass this new, non-sterilizing, experimental technology).
Vaccines through history have gone through a 5-10 year safety approval process.
Did you know the industry has worked on developing a covid vaccine for decades? I have a feeling Pfizer knows what's going to happen to the Chinese and Russian shots that use traditional approaches, and it's not going to be good. With the new technology, we're going to find out with time and more boosters. Also notice that after decades of failure, everyone had a shot that works within months, as soon as liability was waived by governments.
All of the claims about long-term safety for covid shots are inferred from the history of approved vaccines which used different technology, and ignores the history of failed attempts.
ONLY FOR CHILDREN.. Forcing medication on adults is a sever violation of medical ethics. It's also a Nuremberg crime.
*Severe*
There will be no end to the trillion-dollar COVID scheme and its accompanying tyranny because the global mass vaccination policy thwarted the development of natural herd immunity that was on the verge of being achieved a year ago (December 2020 тАЬMedical HypothesesтАЭ article, тАЬIs a COVID-19 Vaccine Developed by Nature Already at Work?тАЭ: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33059225/), and the vaccinated have now put the world at risk for far more virulent forms (e.g., Delta) due to selective pressure being put on the virus to mutate, as was predicted in this December 2020 тАЬNatureтАЭ magazine article (https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-03441-8):
тАЬMass vaccination campaigns will, for the first time, put enormous pressure on SARS-CoV-2 to adapt, and will select for any strain of the virus that might be able to escape immune defences. тАШWeтАЩve never seen a virus like this under selective pressure,тАЩ says Griffin. тАШSo we donтАЩt know how itтАЩs going to respond.тАЩтАЭ
So it is the global mass vaccination program and those who have been gullible enough to buy into this flim-flam that will keep COVID and the perpetual injection scam on repeat forever until we say NO to further reckless health policies and tyranny.
Margaret put her finger on the big issue. These mRNA jabs seem to PREVENT full natural immunity from developing post-infection. This is a dirty secret that will come out in coming months.
Exactly, itтАЩs called original antigenic sin (https://eugyppius.substack.com/p/original-antigenic-sin-is-a-real), but donтАЩt expect propaganda-swallowers to know anything about that or antibody-dependent enhancement (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33113270/). TheyтАЩre not in the BigPharma press releases.
It just so happens I asked Dr. Robert Malone that exact question recently (https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/not-in-the-news-covid-epidemiology). Below is our exchange:
ME: Dr. Malone, when the vaccinated contract COVID after injection, do you know if they develop natural immunity in the same way the unvaccinated do, or is that process thwarted? (Granted, it may still be too early to make such a determination, and this article suggests it is still an unknown: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/articles/PMC8402626/)
If they can still develop antibodies, do you think the highly-transmissible and apparently innocuous Omicron has the potential to achieve the natural herd immunity that we appeared to be on the precipice of a year ago, according to this December 2020 тАЬMedical HypothesesтАЭ article, тАЬIs a COVID-19 Vaccine Developed by Nature Already at Work?тАЭ тАж
DR. MALONE: If vaccinated with a genetic vaccine that only encodes for one protein (spike), the vaccinated do not develop the same protection as those who have caught the disease. There are 29 proteins in SARS-CoV-2 -which the body will mount an immune response with natural infection.
I will personally die before I submit to mandatory annual shots. Never. Such a system can and will be abused. The only way governments can enforce such a regime is genocide against those who refuse. Considering current behavior in Austria, genocide seems to be the plan.
No. Just no.
Millions of people get annual flu shots. Why is it unreasonable to do the same for covid?
If you want an annual mRNA shot go for it.
Not me.
Because they alter your DNA and poison your blood with 5G?
Your statement. Not mine.
What are the vaccination rates for flu?
I ask because I suspect they're quite low, too low to have much effect on prevalence of the disease.