Care to provide any substantive reasoning to your claim?
What is the context and perspective being left out?
What is the misleading BS about Covid you refer to?
Without addressing these assertions, your comment is just vapid, overly emotional, whining. Perhaps you do have point, but I suspect any retort will be more of the same - complet…
Care to provide any substantive reasoning to your claim?
What is the context and perspective being left out?
What is the misleading BS about Covid you refer to?
Without addressing these assertions, your comment is just vapid, overly emotional, whining. Perhaps you do have point, but I suspect any retort will be more of the same - completely emotion driven with zero reason and principle underlying any of it.
I have often commented on all of those points both here and on Mr. Greenwald's twitter feed. The evidence is rampant in his writings; also, it's self-evident in the current post. Go back and read them all yourself. He knows exactly what I'm talking about. In the meantime, apply your sophist reasoning to yourself.
I asked 2 questions that invited you to support your claim. Hard to see much sophistry there.
In your defense, you were commenting directly to Glen, so I suppose it is not the commentariat you wish to persuade.
Still, if you'll indulge me, I noticed that you claim that the voting legislature in question is racist, and I submit that not only is this logically inconsistent, the very reasoning often offered to support it is *incredibly* racist - ironically.
You make no actual answer to Joshua's question Mr. Earl. And then you accuse him of the sophistry you yourself have been plying here in every comment you make.
Care to provide any substantive reasoning to your claim?
What is the context and perspective being left out?
What is the misleading BS about Covid you refer to?
Without addressing these assertions, your comment is just vapid, overly emotional, whining. Perhaps you do have point, but I suspect any retort will be more of the same - completely emotion driven with zero reason and principle underlying any of it.
I have often commented on all of those points both here and on Mr. Greenwald's twitter feed. The evidence is rampant in his writings; also, it's self-evident in the current post. Go back and read them all yourself. He knows exactly what I'm talking about. In the meantime, apply your sophist reasoning to yourself.
Sophist? lol
I asked 2 questions that invited you to support your claim. Hard to see much sophistry there.
In your defense, you were commenting directly to Glen, so I suppose it is not the commentariat you wish to persuade.
Still, if you'll indulge me, I noticed that you claim that the voting legislature in question is racist, and I submit that not only is this logically inconsistent, the very reasoning often offered to support it is *incredibly* racist - ironically.
If it’s so self evident, you shouldn’t have much trouble spelling it out then would you?
You make no actual answer to Joshua's question Mr. Earl. And then you accuse him of the sophistry you yourself have been plying here in every comment you make.
You are a disinformant and a shill.
\\][//